Publication Date
| In 2026 | 2 |
| Since 2025 | 445 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2591 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5866 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13988 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3300 |
| Administrators | 1457 |
| Policymakers | 1317 |
| Teachers | 1078 |
| Researchers | 848 |
| Community | 131 |
| Parents | 115 |
| Media Staff | 114 |
| Students | 110 |
| Counselors | 101 |
| Support Staff | 41 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 1256 |
| Canada | 1187 |
| Australia | 924 |
| Texas | 761 |
| New York (New York) | 758 |
| Florida | 690 |
| New York | 646 |
| Illinois | 610 |
| United Kingdom | 599 |
| United States | 546 |
| North Carolina | 493 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 82 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 135 |
| Does not meet standards | 133 |
Peer reviewedSayegh, Alia – Educational Leadership, 1981
Research findings reveal that successful arts programs offer a wide variety of arts; incorporate the broadest possible range of stimuli, materials, tools, and processes; and focus on historical, ethnic, and formal elements. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Art Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Training, 1980
Evaluation specialists give suggestions for preparing the presentation of negative research results and evaluation outcomes to clients. (SK)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Communication Skills, Consultants, Organizational Objectives
Peer reviewedDemaine, Gail Carter; And Others – Mental Retardation, 1980
PASS (Program Analysis of Service Systems) 3 is an instrument designed for use in the evaluation of any type of service system used by developmentally disabled clients. A factor analysis of the system yielded six rather than two factors, which clearly suggests that the scale taps more areas than previously realized. (PHR)
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Developmental Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Sapone, Carmelo V. – Educational Technology, 1980
Presents an evaluation model representative of specific programmatic components and based on issues of attitude change or personal development, process change or instructional development, and structural change or organizational development, for use in administrative and teacher appraisal. (RAO)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Models, Personnel Management, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedParker, Randall M.; Thomas, Kenneth R. – Journal of Rehabilitation, 1980
Problems related to the evaluation of rehabilitation agencies and rehabilitation education programs are reviewed. Questioned are the assumptions that even shoddy evaluation is better than nothing and that the consumer is one of the best sources of evaluation data. Corruption of data and selective or distorted reporting of results are discussed.…
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Problems, Program Evaluation, Rehabilitation Centers
Peer reviewedSchroeder, Paul E.; Abram, Robert A. – Journal of Vocational Education Research, 1980
Thirty-four standards for vocational education programs in correctional facilities are detailed. The process of their development and field review are discussed, as are potential uses in correctional program planning and evaluation. (SK)
Descriptors: Correctional Education, Correctional Institutions, Program Evaluation, Standards
Peer reviewedCollison, Carol R.; Parsons, Mary Ann – Nursing Outlook, 1980
Shows that direct nursing practice is a viable role for the nursing faculty; that the issues involved are both manageable and complementary to the traditional university role. Defines faculty practice, presents available options, examines administrative support, and describes one college's experience. (CT)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, College Faculty, Faculty Development, Nurses
Peer reviewedWortman, Paul M.; And Others – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1980
What a realistic training program should require, given a broad scope of research methodology, is discussed. Considering the core of evaluation research training, the diversity of methodologies raises issues about what is to be taught and how the involvement of students in actual projects is discussed. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Curriculum, Evaluators, Graduate Study, Models
Peer reviewedMendez, Roy; Sanders, Stanley G. – NASSP Bulletin, 1981
In-school suspension programs can be viable, beneficial tools if they give equal attention to rehabilitation and to order and control. If considered as merely administrative conveniences and strictly disciplinary innovations, they will probably provide no educational benefits. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: In School Suspension, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedEnsley, Robert F. – Catholic Library World, 1980
Discusses some common issues which face all states in determining the extent and style of library services for blind and physically handicapped individuals. (Author/LLS)
Descriptors: Blindness, Library Services, Physical Disabilities, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedRoecks, Alan L. – AEDS Journal, 1979
Evaluation of the MICA project (management of instruction with computer assistance) revealed that the supporting software system was efficient and cost-effective, the instruction was adequate, there was no difference in student achievement, and few changes were necessary in order to implement the program. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Computer Managed Instruction, Elementary Education, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedMaher, P. D., III; Spindell, W. A. – Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 1976
The intent of this paper is to present a brief overview of the type of information that might be included in the applied learning technologist certificate program. (Author)
Descriptors: Curriculum Guides, Evaluation Methods, Performance Criteria, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedGallineau, Timothy L. – Child Study Journal, 1997
Cites several strengths of Upcraft and Schuh's book: (1) presents a context for using assessment in settings other than higher education; (2) communicates clearly and concisely; (3) acquaints the novice with qualitative and quantitative research; (4) provides useful information on assessment instruments; and (5) emphasizes importance of using…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Qualitative Research, Statistical Analysis, Student Personnel Services
Peer reviewedCaracelli, Valerie J.; Greene, Jennifer C. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
Two broad classes of mixed-method designs--component and integrated--that have the potential to combine elements of different inquiry traditions are described. The conceptual ideas advanced in the first chapter are illustrated through selected examples of several mixed-method integrated models. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedDatta, Lois-ellin – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
A pragmatic framework for making decisions about mixed-method designs is proposed and then applied to illustrative evaluation case studies to help identify the strengths and limitations of making practical, contextual, and consequential considerations a primary basis for evaluation design decisions. (Author)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation


