Publication Date
| In 2026 | 2 |
| Since 2025 | 445 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2591 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5866 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13988 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3300 |
| Administrators | 1457 |
| Policymakers | 1317 |
| Teachers | 1078 |
| Researchers | 848 |
| Community | 131 |
| Parents | 115 |
| Media Staff | 114 |
| Students | 110 |
| Counselors | 101 |
| Support Staff | 41 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 1256 |
| Canada | 1187 |
| Australia | 924 |
| Texas | 761 |
| New York (New York) | 758 |
| Florida | 690 |
| New York | 646 |
| Illinois | 610 |
| United Kingdom | 599 |
| United States | 546 |
| North Carolina | 493 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 82 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 135 |
| Does not meet standards | 133 |
Peer reviewedCook, Thomas D. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2002
Discusses reasons randomized experiments in educational research have been so rare and appraises alternatives to experiments that educational evaluators prefer. These alternatives are found wanting whenever a high standard is needed for justifying causal conclusions. (SLD)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedFredericks, Kimberly A.; Carman, Joanne G.; Birkland, Thomas A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Outlines the major intergovernmental and interorganizational challenges associated with doing program evaluation in today's environment and offers recommendations designed to improve evaluation efforts. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Government Role, Program Evaluation, Public Agencies
Peer reviewedSanders, James R. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Proposes a multifaceted approach to making evaluation a part of organizational culture. The approach includes using allies, examples, models, research, process guides, and trainers/developers. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Organizational Culture, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedPatton, Michael Quinn – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Discusses teaching and training about evaluation with metaphors. Helping those who study evaluation perceive analogies and metaphors related to evaluation helps them understand truths about the rich diversity of evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Metaphors, Program Evaluation, Teaching Methods
Peer reviewedWisely, D. Susan – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Discusses four reasons why progress in evaluation in private foundations has been so slow and intermittent. These include: (1) inflated claims for the power of evaluation as a guide; (2) foundations' distance from the consequences of their actions; (3) sensitivity to hostile criticism and the difficulties of learning from legitimate criticism; and…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Philanthropic Foundations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedMorris, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Comments on two articles related to ethical challenges in evaluation and a series of articles on the subject published in the "American Journal of Evaluation" between 1998 and 2001. Considers the problems of ethical challenges in the context of principles and standards for evaluation developed by professional associations. (SLD)
Descriptors: Ethics, Evaluation Methods, Professional Associations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedChamings, Patricia A.; And Others – Nursing Outlook, 1990
In the latest survey of nursing school deans and nursing researchers, 280 of the nation's 467 accredited schools of nursing were named as being among the best at least once. The University of Washington's School of Nursing was ranked number one for the second consecutive time. (JOW)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Higher Education, Nursing Education, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedLapine, Louise – Evaluation Practice, 1987
The use of the Nominal Group Technique to identify areas for formative evaluation is described. Group characteristics, pertinent group questions, and advantages of the method are outlined. The process depersonalizes results, puts individual concerns into perspective, and focuses on improving the program (not on blaming or evaluating personnel).…
Descriptors: Decision Making, Formative Evaluation, Group Discussion, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedLucas, Stephen; And Others – Journal of Education for Business, 1989
Describes a methodology to facilitate the evaluation of secondary marketing education (ME) programs. Compares the status of ME programs at the national level with a set of national program standards. Also compares the ME program in a selected state with the same standards. (JOW)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Marketing, Program Evaluation, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedKelly, Patrick; Miller, Will – Public Administration Review, 1989
Use of statistical measures in public policy analysis must be examined both from the perspective of statistical appropriateness and for policy bias. The need for twofold analysis is illustrated by an examination of two measures used for evaluation of school desegregation. (Author/JOW)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, School Desegregation, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewedGreene, Jennifer C. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1988
Linkages between utilization and stakeholder participation in the evaluation process are discussed, with emphasis on the communication of results. Data from two small-scale participatory evaluations are used to support the argument that key elements of the participatory process can be linked to meaningful and multiple forms of research…
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Program Evaluation, Research Utilization, Use Studies
Kirkpatrick, Donald – Training and Development, 1996
Kirkpatrick reviews his 1959 article presenting his four-level model of evaluation. He suggests that training professionals should evaluate their programs and understanding those four levels is a good start. The text of the original article is included. (JOW)
Descriptors: Adult Education, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedOsbourne, Judith L.; House, Reese M. – Counselor Education and Supervision, 1995
Reduced funding and increased accreditation requirements place counseling education programs in a dilemma that demands systematic program evaluation. This article reviews the literature on evaluation of professional programs and proposes a plan for evaluation of counselor education programs. (JPS)
Descriptors: Counselor Training, Curriculum Development, Higher Education, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedWagner, Ellen D. – Adult Learning, 1995
Anticipating and supporting the needs of users of technologies, programs, and services are critical to the success of distance education programs. Principal stakeholders are instructors who teach at a distance, learners pursuing distance education courses, site facilitators, and administrators. (JOW)
Descriptors: Adult Education, Distance Education, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedPosavac, Emil J. – Evaluation Practice, 1995
A technique developed to monitor the quality of manufactured products, statistical process control (SPC), incorporates several features that may prove attractive to evaluators. This paper reviews the history of SPC, suggests how the approach can enrich program evaluation, and illustrates its use in a hospital-based example. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Quality Control, Research Methodology


