Publication Date
| In 2026 | 2 |
| Since 2025 | 445 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2591 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5866 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13988 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3300 |
| Administrators | 1457 |
| Policymakers | 1317 |
| Teachers | 1078 |
| Researchers | 848 |
| Community | 131 |
| Parents | 115 |
| Media Staff | 114 |
| Students | 110 |
| Counselors | 101 |
| Support Staff | 41 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 1256 |
| Canada | 1187 |
| Australia | 924 |
| Texas | 761 |
| New York (New York) | 758 |
| Florida | 690 |
| New York | 646 |
| Illinois | 610 |
| United Kingdom | 599 |
| United States | 546 |
| North Carolina | 493 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 82 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 135 |
| Does not meet standards | 133 |
Peer reviewedMcConney, Andrew; Rudd, Andy; Ayres, Robert – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Proposes a method for synthesizing findings within mixed-method program evaluations. The proposed method uses a set of criteria and analytic techniques to assess the worth of each data source or type and to establish what each says about program effect. Once data are on a common scale, simple mathematics allows synthesis across data sources or…
Descriptors: Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Synthesis
Peer reviewedHanes, John C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Describes the number needed to treat (NNT) as an indicator of a program's efficacy. L'Abbe plots compare several programs in terms of the event rates that constitute the NNTs. Explains how an evaluator may extend the NNT concept by calculating and plotting event rates on a continuous ordinal basis. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Nonparametric Statistics, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedPatton, Michael Quinn – Evaluation Practice, 1988
The role of the evaluator in insuring utilization and quality of evaluation results is discussed. Topics covered include a utilization-focused vision of accountability, overcoming staff fears of evaluation, eliciting the right information from users, situational responsiveness, and advocacy. (TJH)
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators, Program Evaluation, Responsibility
Bernthal, Paul R. – Training and Development, 1995
A modification of Donald Kirkpatrick's model suggests use of a training-impact tree to identify variables that could establish links between training and organizational values. Steps include identifying organizational values and practices; identifying skills, knowledge, and attitudes; defining scope and purpose of evaluation; gathering data; and…
Descriptors: Adult Education, Models, Program Evaluation, Training
Peer reviewedHoefer, Richard – Social Work, 1994
Presents, in light-hearted way, a few rules of evaluation practice wisdom that, if followed, would result in more rigorous and useful evaluations of human services programs. Although none of the ideas is totally original, it is suggested that as a group they provide handy checklist for practitioners who are developing or assessing evaluation…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Human Services, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedZacharakis-Jutz, Jeff; Gajenayake, Stanley – Adult Learning, 1994
A task force was set up to develop a system of evaluating community-based, nonprofit organizations that were members of the Rockford, Illinois, United Way. The task force experimented with participatory evaluation, which resulted in an action plan for the groups. (JOW)
Descriptors: Community Organizations, Nonprofit Organizations, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedMedaugh, Barbara – Journal of Volunteer Administration, 1999
An experienced volunteer discusses the importance of volunteer evaluation and encourages volunteer administrators to consider their policy of volunteer evaluations from a volunteer's point of view. (JOW)
Descriptors: Adults, Personnel Evaluation, Program Evaluation, Volunteers
Peer reviewedHenry, Gary T. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Identifies five themes that illustrate different aspects of the process of diffusing democratic deliberation into more widespread use: (1) appreciation; (2) addition; (3) apprehension; (4) application; and (5) adaptation. These themes give guidance concerning evaluation practice and the role of evaluation in society. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Politics, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedHammond, A.; Lincoln, N.; Sutcliffe, L. – Patient Education and Counseling, 1999
Joint protection, a self-management technique taught to people with rheumatoid arthritis, was used in a group education program. A crossover trial (N=35) was conducted. No significant changes in measures of pain, functional disability, grip strength, self-efficacy or helplessness occurred post-education, although this may have been due to the…
Descriptors: Patient Education, Program Evaluation, Self Management
Peer reviewedSafrit, R. Dale; Merrill, Mary – Journal of Volunteer Administration, 1998
Targeting Outcomes of Programs is a model used to assess volunteer program inputs (resources, activities, participation), outcomes (reactions, changes in knowledge, skills, opinions, aspirations), and impact (practice changes and societal, economic, and environmental impacts). (SK)
Descriptors: Models, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Volunteers
Peer reviewedRogers, Patricia J.; Petrosino, Anthony; Huebner, Tracy A.; Hacsi, Timothy A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Describes the development of program theory evaluation and the various versions of program theory evaluation currently in use. Discusses some of the differences between theory and evaluation practice. Program theory evaluation consists of an explicit theory or model of how a program causes outcomes and an evaluation that is at least partially…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation, Theories
Peer reviewedWeiss, Carol Hirschon – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Provides guidance about which links in program theory to study and which theories to use. In choosing the links to study, the first criterion is to choose the links that are most critical to the success of the program. The second criterion is the degree of uncertainty about the linkage. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation, Theories
Peer reviewedHacsi, Timothy A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Discusses the potential that program theory evaluation has to provide knowledge about the parts of a program that should be retained and the parts that can be changed or should be abandoned. Considers why program theory evaluation may be able to give some guidance about how a program should be changed to function in a new and different…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Program Improvement
Peer reviewedBickman, Leonard – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Summarizes interesting aspects of the preceding chapters and the issues and concerns raised related to program theory evaluation. Suggests that evaluators may be fighting a losing battle in their efforts to shore up weak programs through the introduction of program theory evaluation, asserting that the development of strong program theory should…
Descriptors: Causal Models, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedCousins, J. Bradley – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2001
Studied the convergence of evaluator and non-evaluator perspectives about collaborative evaluation. Results based on work of 67 pairs of evaluators and program practitioners show that, generally, program practitioners were more conservative in their opinions. Many differences in the two perspectives are noted. (SLD)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Evaluation


