Publication Date
| In 2026 | 2 |
| Since 2025 | 445 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2591 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5866 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 13988 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 3300 |
| Administrators | 1457 |
| Policymakers | 1317 |
| Teachers | 1078 |
| Researchers | 848 |
| Community | 131 |
| Parents | 115 |
| Media Staff | 114 |
| Students | 110 |
| Counselors | 101 |
| Support Staff | 41 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| California | 1256 |
| Canada | 1187 |
| Australia | 924 |
| Texas | 761 |
| New York (New York) | 758 |
| Florida | 690 |
| New York | 646 |
| Illinois | 610 |
| United Kingdom | 599 |
| United States | 546 |
| North Carolina | 493 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 82 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 135 |
| Does not meet standards | 133 |
Jones, J. A. G. – Ind Training Int, 1969
Descriptors: Industrial Training, Program Evaluation, Supervisory Training
Collins, Mike – Ind Training Int, 1969
Descriptors: Construction Industry, Industrial Training, Program Evaluation
Hennessy, Daivd E. – Training in Bus and Ind, 1969
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Industrial Training, Program Evaluation
Cunningham, Cyril – Ind Training Int, 1969
Descriptors: Interviews, Management Development, Personality, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedNelipovich, Michael – Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1982
An analysis of major recommendations of the National Accreditation Council for Agencies Serving the Blind and Visually Handicapped received by 50 state and not-for-profit agencies raised questions about emphasis on administrative standards and low concern about physical facilities. Suggestions, including elimination of duplications, are made. (CL)
Descriptors: Accreditation (Institutions), Blindness, Program Evaluation, Surveys
Peer reviewedGreene, Jennifer C.; Caracelli, Valerie J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
Three primary stances on the wisdom of mixing evaluation models while mixing evaluation methods frame the challenges to defensible mixed-method evaluative inquiry. These challenges are addressed by shifting the mixed-method controversy from models toward other critical features of disparate traditions of inquiry. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Definitions, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedWeiss, Carol H. – Evaluation Review, 1997
Explores the problems of theory-based evaluation, describes the nature of potential benefits, and suggests that the benefits are significant enough to warrant continued effort to overcome the obstacles and advance its use. Many of the problems are related to inadequate theories about pathways to desired program outcomes. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Program Evaluation
Root, Susan; Eyler, Janet; Gilles, Dwight – Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum, 2003
Examines the effects of the Bonner Scholars Program, a stipended college service program, that focuses on the development of community service ethics. Discusses the results of the study on the program's effectiveness for 265 students from 9 colleges and universities in the midwest and south. (SWM)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Program Evaluation, Service Learning
Peer reviewedSabo, Kim – New Directions for Evaluation, 2003
Applies Lev Vygotsky's concept of developmental learning to youth-led evaluation projects and discusses the role of participatory evaluation in supporting youth to move beyond socially determined roles to become active participants in evaluation and their own growth. (SLD)
Descriptors: Child Development, Participation, Program Evaluation, Youth
Peer reviewedHerrell, James M., Ed.; Straw, Roger B., Ed. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
The seven articles in this issue represent an approach to multisite evaluation that has much in common with the tradition of clinical trials. However, this approach shares with cluster evaluation an appreciation for the adjustments that are necessary to reflect the realities of conducting evaluation research in actual service settings. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedFranke, Todd Michael; Christie, Christina A.; Parra, Michelle T. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2003
Describes a utilization-focused evaluation "gone awry" when two of the primary intended users left the program and were replaced. Discussion centers on the potential choices for use when intended users are no longer part of an evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Utilization, Program Evaluation, Users (Information)
Peer reviewedSielbeck-Bowen, Kathryn A.; Brisolara, Sharon; Siegart, Denise; Tischler, Camille; Whitmore, Elizabeth – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
Reflections on the many strands of feminist thinking offered in this volume underscore a common commitment to the well-being of women, and thereby of men. Charts directions for continuing the conversation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Feminism, Gender Issues, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedLacey, Candace; LeBlanc, Patrice; Collins, Mary – Planning and Changing, 2000
Evaluates Palm Beach County School District's Safe School Center tutorial program, a summer-school program for middle-school students who failed subjects during the academic year. Describes program successes, failures, and lessons learned. (Contains 38 references.) (PKP)
Descriptors: Middle Schools, Program Evaluation, Tutorial Programs
Peer reviewedMorris, Daniel – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2002
Examines the theoretical foundations of the belief that stakeholder involvement empowers the stakeholders and increases evaluation utilization and the validity of the evaluation. Discusses conditions under which these benefits are realized and situations in which they are not. (SLD)
Descriptors: Empowerment, Evaluation Methods, Participation, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedDonaldson, Stewart I.; Gooler, Laura E.; Scriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Discusses the sources and signs of excessive evaluation anxiety in program evaluation and provides some strategies to help evaluators prevent and manage this common problem. Shows how more than technical skills are required to conduct high quality program evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Evaluation


