Publication Date
In 2025 | 1 |
Since 2024 | 14 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 62 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 191 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 557 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Hambleton, Ronald K. | 37 |
Popham, W. James | 30 |
Ediger, Marlow | 15 |
Roid, Gale | 12 |
Baker, Eva L. | 11 |
Wilcox, Rand R. | 11 |
Berk, Ronald A. | 10 |
Haladyna, Tom | 10 |
Livingston, Samuel A. | 10 |
Millman, Jason | 10 |
Nitko, Anthony J. | 10 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 255 |
Teachers | 141 |
Researchers | 99 |
Administrators | 31 |
Policymakers | 17 |
Parents | 13 |
Community | 9 |
Students | 6 |
Counselors | 2 |
Support Staff | 1 |
Location
Georgia | 85 |
Australia | 50 |
Florida | 36 |
Missouri | 31 |
Texas | 28 |
Canada | 24 |
Oklahoma | 18 |
Illinois | 17 |
South Carolina | 16 |
United States | 16 |
California | 15 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards | 5 |
Hauenstein, A. Dean – Man/Society/Technology--A Journal of Industrial Arts Education, 1973
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests, Curriculum Development, Curriculum Evaluation
Burns, Richard W. – Educational Technology, 1972
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Behavioral Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests

DeRose, James V. – Science Teacher, 1972
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Evaluation, Grade 7, Individualized Instruction

Anderson, Richard C.; And Others – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972
Data indicate that performance is better when feedback is provided after, rather than before, the response. (MB)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Data Analysis, Educational Research, Feedback
Koen, B. V.; Keller, F. S. – Journal of Engineering Education, 1971
Descriptors: College Science, Continuous Progress Plan, Course Descriptions, Criterion Referenced Tests
Haladyna, Thomas M.; Roid, Gale H. – Educational Technology, 1983
Summarizes item review in the development of criterion-referenced tests, including logical item review, which examines the match between instructional intent and the items; empirical item review, which examines response patterns; traditional item review; and instructional sensitivity of test items. Twenty-eight references are listed. (MBR)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Research, Literature Reviews, Teaching Methods

Mills, Craig N. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1983
This study compares the results obtained using the Angoff, borderline group, and contrasting groups methods of determining performance standards. Congruent results were obtained from the Angoff and contrasting groups methods for several test forms. Borderline group standards were not similar to standards obtained with other methods. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring)
Zwarts, Michel A. – Evaluation in Education: International Progress, 1982
The increasing relation between domain-referenced measurement and its implications in instruction are discussed with the argument that construction methods available do not guarantee content validity which needs more attention to be effective. Two domain-referenced testing procedures illustrate construction and validity problems. (CM)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Testing, Evaluation Methods

Cocks, Errol – Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 1982
As part of a broad exploratory research project, both norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measures were utilized as child outcome measures for a group of 49 intellectually handicapped children aged from 12 to 48 months who participated in eary intervention programs. Findings suggested that criterion-referenced measures are more sensitive to…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Intervention, Mental Retardation, Norm Referenced Tests
Popham, W. James – Health Education (Washington D.C.), 1982
Health education researchers have occasionally used measuring tools inappropriately. Test validity and the use of criterion-referenced tests are discussed in view of this need to improve health education research. Also described are handbooks containing measuring devices for the use of health education researchers. (CJ)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Research, Health Education, Measurement Techniques

van der Linden, Wim J. – Psychometrika, 1981
Decision rules for assigning students to treatments based upon aptitudes or criterion scores are discussed. Popular procedures are criticized and a Bayesian approach is recommended. The effect of unreliability of aptitude or criterion scores is also discussed. (JKS)
Descriptors: Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Decision Making

Gross, Alan L.; Shulman, Vivian – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1980
The suitability of the beta binomial test model for criterion referenced testing was investigated, first by considering whether underlying assumptions are realistic, and second, by examining the robustness of the model. Results suggest that the model may have practical value. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Goodness of Fit, Higher Education, Item Sampling

Hudson, Walter W. – Journal of Education for Social Work, 1981
A system that helps students monitor their progress by providing regular feedback and producing a learning curve for each student as well as the whole class is described. The system is also designed to help faculty evaluate their own teaching performance. (MSE)
Descriptors: Competency Based Education, Criterion Referenced Tests, Faculty Evaluation, Feedback

Pellegrini, A.D.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Investigated two variance estimation procedures on a normed test treated as a criterion-referenced test. The first estimation procedure estimated the standard deviation systematically higher, whereas the second procedure's estimation was systematically lower than the actual standard deviation. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: Credibility, Criterion Referenced Tests, Disadvantaged Youth, Educationally Disadvantaged
Kamratowski, Joachim; Penne, Klaus-Juergen – Englisch, 1979
Reviews briefly the development of testing since World War II. Presents the criteria for informal and standardized tests, and explains the difference between norm-oriented and criterion-oriented tests. Considers technical aspects of testing, but stresses the importance of pedagogical aspects. (IFS/WGA)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Language Tests, Norm Referenced Tests