Publication Date
| In 2026 | 2 |
| Since 2025 | 441 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1920 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 4492 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 6977 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 454 |
| Practitioners | 319 |
| Teachers | 128 |
| Administrators | 73 |
| Policymakers | 33 |
| Counselors | 31 |
| Students | 17 |
| Parents | 10 |
| Community | 6 |
| Support Staff | 5 |
Location
| Turkey | 831 |
| Australia | 239 |
| China | 211 |
| Canada | 207 |
| Indonesia | 161 |
| Spain | 129 |
| United States | 123 |
| United Kingdom | 121 |
| Germany | 111 |
| Taiwan | 108 |
| Netherlands | 102 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 2 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 2 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Stonewater, Jerry; And Others – Journal of College Student Personnel, 1986
Reliability and validity aspects of the Student Developmental Task Inventory-2nd Ed. (SDTI-2) are reported, including test-retest correlations, internal consistency, task-subtask correlations, social desirability effects, and sex differences in responses. (Author/ABB)
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedDe Obaldia, Ricardo; Parsons, Oscar A. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1984
Investigated the reliability and validity of the methods used to measure primary versus secondary alcoholism and claimed childhood symptoms of hyperkinesis/minimal brain dysfunction (Hk/MBD) in three separate studies (N=45), (N=53), (N=38). Results supported the Primary/Secondary Classification Questionnaire and the Hk/MBD Childhood Symptoms…
Descriptors: Alcoholism, Clinical Diagnosis, Questionnaires, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedChambless, Dianne L.; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1984
Demonstrated the reliability of the Body Sensations Questionnaire and the Agorophobic Cognitions Questionnaire on two clinical samples (N=175). The instruments fared well on tests of discriminant and construct validity. Concluded that these self-report inventories are useful, inexpensive, and easily scored measures for clinical and research…
Descriptors: Adults, Fear, Test Construction, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedGreen, Kathy; And Others – Exceptional Children, 1983
In a study involving 50 undergraduate and graduate education students the Attitudes Toward Mainstreaming Scale was found to have a large first factor with adequate reliability. There was a low correlation between knowledge and ATMS scores, although knowledge was more strongly related to classroom acceptance of exceptional students. (CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Knowledge Level, Mainstreaming, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewedStack, Jacqueline G. – American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1984
In a study designed to examine the effects of the difference in method of administration of interrater reliability of the Adaptive Behavior Scale, there were no significant differences in reliability coefficients among informants using three administration methods. Levels of agreement apparently differed with the type of behavior being observed.…
Descriptors: Adaptive Behavior (of Disabled), Mental Retardation, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedZiomek, Robert L.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
The Ross Educational Philosophical Inventory was psychometrically examined through the use of expert judges and factor analysis of a sample of responses to the inventory. Results are negative in general, but moderately positive results were found in relation to two of the four categories of the inventory. (JKS)
Descriptors: Educational Philosophy, Factor Analysis, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedCicchetti, Domenic V. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1976
A computer program which computes both the interjudge reliability of individual measurements and the extent to which the judges are biased in their ratings vis-a-vis each other is presented. The methods proposed are recommended on the basis of recent developments in statistical research. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Individual Testing, Test Bias, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedGardiner, Gareth S.; Schroder, Harold M. – Psychological Reports, 1972
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Psychological Studies, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Peer reviewedSchafer, William D. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
A listing of the program and a program description may be obtained by writing the author at the Department of Measurement and Statistics, College of Education, University of Maryland. (Author/MB)
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Program Descriptions, Test Reliability, Test Validity
Luszki, Margaret Barron; And Others – J Consult Clin Psychol, 1970
It was hypothesized that one could predict the reliability of the shortened WAIS on the basis of the Spearman Brown formula, and that in testing, as in other fields, you get what you pay for. Results confirmed these hypotheses; a short form is not an adequate substitute for the full WAIS. (Author)
Descriptors: Clinical Diagnosis, Intelligence Tests, Research, Test Reliability
Bach, Zellig – NJEA Review, 1971
Descriptors: Cultural Differences, Intelligence Tests, Test Bias, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedPanyard, Christine Marie – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Interpersonal Relationship, Measurement Instruments, Personality, Questionnaires
Peer reviewedAbrahams, Norman M.; And Others – Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971
Provides a set of tables, similar to the Taylor-Russell tables, to evaluate the usefulness of selection tests in which assumptions require point-biserial validity coefficients. (MB)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Measurement, Predictive Validity, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedMehryar, A. H.; Shapurian, R. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Reliability, Secondary School Students, Statistical Analysis, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedCropley, A. J.; Clapson, L. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Creativity Tests, Evaluation Criteria, Predictive Validity, Test Reliability


