Publication Date
In 2025 | 86 |
Since 2024 | 437 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1477 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3086 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6521 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 4876 |
Administrators | 1667 |
Teachers | 1521 |
Policymakers | 797 |
Community | 307 |
Researchers | 256 |
Parents | 215 |
Counselors | 172 |
Media Staff | 160 |
Students | 149 |
Support Staff | 56 |
More ▼ |
Location
Canada | 778 |
California | 684 |
Australia | 576 |
Florida | 426 |
New York | 425 |
Texas | 394 |
Illinois | 391 |
United States | 346 |
Pennsylvania | 308 |
United Kingdom | 290 |
North Carolina | 271 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 4 |
Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 5 |
Does not meet standards | 8 |
Truskie, Stanley D. – Personnel Administrator, 1981
A successful in-house management development program is characterized by staff involvement in planning, designing, and conducting the program. Top management support is critical, as are program diversity and relevancy, preparation and excellence, and evaluation and followup. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Business, Management Development, Program Development, Program Evaluation

Ridings, Jeri M.; Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1981
The Standards for Evaluations of Educational Programs, Projects, and Materials was published in 1980 by the McGraw-Hill Company. Three sections of this article discuss major issues related to the development of the Standards, its content and form, and the work planned for its application and future development. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Program Development, Program Evaluation, Standards

Teacher Education and Special Education, 1982
The article offers guidelines for severely handicapped personnel preparation programs. Five areas which need to be addressed by such programs are addressed: need for the program, adequacy of resources to develop and maintain the program, staff needs and instructional integrity, program limitation, and a process for program evaluation. (SB)
Descriptors: Models, Program Development, Severe Disabilities, Teacher Education
Palmer, Libby – Teacher, 1980
The author describes how her personal interest in puzzles led her to create Puzzle Parties at the College of Santa Fe in New Mexico. Now regular events, these puzzle parties attract several hundred adults and children from the community. (SJL)
Descriptors: Exhibits, Program Development, Puzzles, School Community Programs

Platt, Jennifer M.; Platt, John S. – Teaching Exceptional Children, 1980
The development and operation of a successful volunteer program to assist in mainstreaming special education elementary students are traced. Recruitment, orientation, role responsibilities, and evaluation of the volunteers are discussed. (CL)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Education, Mainstreaming, Program Development

Silverman, S. Richard – American Annals of the Deaf, 1980
The first of thirteen papers presented at a 1980 conference on rubella-caused deafness provides an overview of the problems involved in advocacy, organization, and planning of services. (CL)
Descriptors: Adults, Deafness, Delivery Systems, Program Development

Schatz, Eleanor M.; Sanborn, Marshall P. – Roeper Review, 1980
General premises and specific steps in developing a successful consultation program for parents of gifted students are identifed. Procedures begin with defining specific outcomes for each session and culminate in conducting follow-through and follow-up evaluations. (CL)
Descriptors: Consultation Programs, Gifted, Parent Participation, Program Development
Grady, Joan B. – American School Board Journal, 1979
Outlines the advantages of implementing an advanced placement program in a high school and the steps that are involved in doing so. (IRT)
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, High Schools, Program Development
Cramer, Jerome – American School Board Journal, 1979
Describes the elements of a successful school breakfast program, argues for the ease with which one can be implemented, and answers criticisms against such a program. (IRT)
Descriptors: Breakfast Programs, Elementary Secondary Education, Program Development
Mead, Bernard F., Jr. – Parks and Recreation, 1979
Increasing specialization in recreation services calls for changes in recreation education. (JD)
Descriptors: Change Strategies, Curriculum Design, Program Development, Recreation
Elsie, Lester J.; Patterson, Amos C. – NSPI Journal, 1979
Suggests a set of rules by which organizational managers may regulate or control the rate of instructional development. (JEG)
Descriptors: Administration, Administrators, Guidelines, Instructional Development

Gates, Barbara A. – Library Resources and Technical Services, 1980
Offers suggestions concerning important elements in planning workshops: organization of committees, program planning, definition of topic and purpose, statement of objectives, the audience, format, timing, site selection, registration, publicity, speaker selection, contracts, budgets, and evaluation questionnaires. (FM)
Descriptors: Committees, Objectives, Program Development, Site Selection

Mitchell, Ronald – National Elementary Principal, 1979
Outlines some considerations a principal should keep in mind when planning a middle school. (IRT)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Middle Schools, Program Development

Barclay, Raymond W., Jr. – Adult Learning, 1997
Suggestions to strengthen the program planning process and to match communication strategies with program objectives include selecting the right people, limiting group size, naming a facilitator, agreeing on a technique, respecting opinions, identifying audiences, reviewing market research, listening to clients, and selecting the right media. (JOW)
Descriptors: Adult Education, Group Dynamics, Planning, Program Development

Wilson, Arthur L.; Cervero, Ronald M. – Adult Learning, 1996
If planners want to be ethically responsible for the consequences of their work, all who are affected by the program should be at the planning table. The reality of planning is that those with the most power will construct programs according to their interests. Planners must take responsibility to foster substantive involvement. (JOW)
Descriptors: Adult Education, Ethics, Participation, Planning