NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ735912
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2004-Dec
Pages: 9
Abstractor: Author
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0361-0365
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
How Reliable Are Our Assessment Data?: A Comparison of the Reliability of Data Produced in Graded and Un-Graded Conditions
Napoli, Anthony R.; Raymond, Lanette A.
Research in Higher Education, v45 n8 p921-929 Dec 2004
Motivating students to perform well on assessment tests is difficult when students know the results have no academic consequence. The present study evaluates the influence of assessment context (graded vs. non-graded) on the reliability of an assessment measure. Results indicate the graded condition produces higher reliability (r = 0.71) than the non-graded condition (r = 0.29), which leads to unacceptably low reliability. Moreover, the graded condition produces significantly higher scores (M = 64%), than the non-graded condition (M = 43%). Only students in the graded condition (41%) obtained passing scores of 70% or above.
Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com.bibliotheek.ehb.be
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Higher Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A