We need fewer public libraries with greater dependence. Here at the beginning of the 21st century, public libraries are still saddled with a 19th-century model of government. They are far too beholden to governing authorities, usually municipal or county governments, for their financial sustenance. This is a formula for mediocrity. "Local control" is the watchword of that 19th-century model of government. It is based on the idea that citizens have a right and responsibility to govern themselves and to control issues at the local level, issues that are outside the purview of the state and federal authorities. Zoning, land use policies, public schools, and public libraries are all examples of government services that are usually subject to local control. Tough economic times can be the catalyst for change. Large libraries have deep collections, seasoned staffs, historical perspective, and broad-based programming expertise to contribute. Collectively, smaller libraries bring a growing tax base, often a growing service population, and frequently a concentration on preschool-and school-aged children. With a focus on their strengths, larger and smaller libraries could create together a new and far more dynamic organization--a consolidation based on strengths. The goal of consolidation is increased efficiency. Usually this is realized in areas like human resources, accounting, and marketing. It will be difficult to convince voters to support a merger if it eliminates "their" library. Still, some discussion of how decisions on closures would be made is essential.