Logic Gone Wrong: A Reply to DeYoung, Howley, & Theobald (1995) (Jon Wiles) [and] Argument Misguided and Divisive: A Reply to DeYoung, Howley, & Theobald (1995) (Joan Lipsitz) [and] Revisiting and Extending the Argument: A Rejoinder to Wiles and Lipsitz (Alan J. DeYoung, Craig Howley, Paul Theobald).

Wiles, Jon

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

Direct link

ERIC Number: EJ520528

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1995

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: ISSN-8756-0534

EISSN: N/A

Available Date: N/A

Logic Gone Wrong: A Reply to DeYoung, Howley, & Theobald (1995) (Jon Wiles) [and] Argument Misguided and Divisive: A Reply to DeYoung, Howley, & Theobald (1995) (Joan Lipsitz) [and] Revisiting and Extending the Argument: A Rejoinder to Wiles and Lipsitz (Alan J. DeYoung, Craig Howley, Paul Theobald).

Wiles, Jon

Journal of Research in Rural Education, v11 n2 p128-33 Fall 1995

Two viewpoints criticize the views of DeYoung and others by claiming that the middle school movement came about as a result of research documenting the developmental needs of children. Rejoinder by DeYoung and others maintains that this trend has led to the loss of rural communities and had more to do with economic factors and rural elementary school consolidation. (LP)

Descriptors: Child Development, Consolidated Schools, Economic Factors, Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Middle Schools, Politics of Education, Rural Areas, Rural Education, Rural Schools, School Community Relationship, School Size, Small Schools

Publication Type: Opinion Papers; Journal Articles

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Author Affiliations: N/A