Assessment of Individual Differences in Preferences for Holistic-Analytic Strategies: Evaluation of Some Commonly Available Instruments.

Beyler, Jane; Schmeck, Ronald Ray

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ453820

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1992

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: ISSN-0013-1644

EISSN: N/A

Available Date: N/A

Assessment of Individual Differences in Preferences for Holistic-Analytic Strategies: Evaluation of Some Commonly Available Instruments.

Beyler, Jane; Schmeck, Ronald Ray

Educational and Psychological Measurement, v52 n3 p709-19 Fall 1992

The construct validity of the holistic-analytic continuum in information processing strategies was generally supported by an evaluation of the following instruments: (1) the Inventory of Learning Processes; (2) the Human Information Processing Survey; (3) the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator; and (4) the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Subjects were 300 undergraduates. (SLD)

Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Comparative Testing, Construct Validity, Higher Education, Holistic Approach, Individual Differences, Measures (Individuals), Psychological Testing, Questionnaires, Undergraduate Students

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: Eysenck Personality Inventory; Inventory of Learning Processes; Myers Briggs Type Indicator

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Author Affiliations: N/A