All Charting of Student Performance Is Not Precision Teaching: A Response to Koorland and Nelson.

Marston, Douglas; Deno, Stanley L.

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ416637

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1990

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: ISSN-0014-4029

EISSN: N/A

Available Date: N/A

All Charting of Student Performance Is Not Precision Teaching: A Response to Koorland and Nelson.

Marston, Douglas; Deno, Stanley L.

Exceptional Children, v57 n1 p73-75 Sep 1990

This article responds to a criticism (EC 231 964) of a paper that discusses graphs for measuring progress on individual education plans (EC 210 837). It notes that the type of chart used is not a major issue; the important point is that teachers repeatedly gather data on educationally relevant tasks and evaluate intervention effectiveness. (JDD)

Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Graphs, Individualized Education Programs, Instructional Effectiveness, Measurement Techniques, Measures (Individuals), Precision Teaching, Predictive Measurement, Student Evaluation, Teaching Methods

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Opinion Papers

Education Level: N/A

Audience: Practitioners; Researchers

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Author Affiliations: N/A