Planned and Post Hoc Comparisons in Tests of Concordance and Discordance for G Groups of Judges.

Serlin, Ronald C.; Marascuilo, Leonard A.

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ313064

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1983

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

Available Date: N/A

Planned and Post Hoc Comparisons in Tests of Concordance and Discordance for G Groups of Judges.

Serlin, Ronald C.; Marascuilo, Leonard A.

Journal of Educational Statistics, v8 n3 p187-205 Fall 1983

Two alternatives to the problems of conducting planned and post hoc comparisons in tests of concordance and discordance for G groups of judges are examined. The two models are illustrated using existing data. (Author/JKS)

Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Comparative Analysis, Interrater Reliability, Mathematical Models, Statistical Analysis

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Author Affiliations: N/A