Aptitude- versus Content-Treatment Interactions: Implications for Instructional Design.

Jonassen, David H.

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

ERIC Number: EJ272965

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1982

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

Available Date: N/A

Aptitude- versus Content-Treatment Interactions: Implications for Instructional Design.

Jonassen, David H.

Journal of Instructional Development, v5 n4 p15-27 Sum 1982

Critiques Aptitude-Treatment Interactions (ATI) as a major theoretical foundation for individualized instruction and argues that Content-Treatment Analysis (CTI), which assumes that no one learning treatment is appropriate for all subject content, is more appropriate. It is concluded that CTI should be given a greater role in instructional development. Cites 121 references. (JJD)

Descriptors: Aptitude Treatment Interaction, Cognitive Processes, Higher Education, Instructional Development, Learning Theories, Research Methodology, Task Analysis

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Opinion Papers; Information Analyses

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Author Affiliations: N/A