Relative Utility of Computerized Versus Paper-and-Pencil Tests for Predicting Job Performance.

Cory, Charles H.

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ188014

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1977

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

Available Date: N/A

Relative Utility of Computerized Versus Paper-and-Pencil Tests for Predicting Job Performance

Cory, Charles H.

Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 4, 551-64, F 77

This article presents predictive validity data for on-job performance for a set of computerized Graphic and Interactive Processing (GRIP) tests in conjunction with data for both experimental paper-and-pencil and operational tests. Validity coefficients for job element and global criteria are reported for four different jobs. (See also EJ 161 400). (Author/CTM)

Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Cognitive Ability, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Graphics, Job Performance, Job Skills, Military Personnel, Occupational Tests, Predictive Validity, Task Analysis, Test Validity, Vocational Aptitude

Publication Type: N/A

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Author Affiliations: N/A