NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1465209
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2013
Pages: 6
Abstractor: ERIC
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0013-8274
EISSN: EISSN-2161-8895
Available Date: 0000-00-00
Asinine Assessment: Why High-Stakes Testing Is Bad for Everyone, Including English Teachers
Wayne Au; Karen Gourd
English Journal, v103 n1 p14-19 2013
High-stakes standardized testing has become ubiquitous in US education. In this article, the authors argue that not only is such testing bad for education, but it also contradicts curriculum and instruction aligned with professional standards promoted by NCTE and innovative educators. Additionally, contradictory to the concept of "no child left behind," high-stakes standardized tests have negative impacts on students of color. However, the authors also know that English teachers can make a positive difference in the education of youth through creative curricular resistance and by keeping the big picture of the discipline as the heart and soul of curriculum, instruction, and assessment.
National Council of Teachers of English. 1111 West Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096. Tel: 877-369-6283; Tel: 217-328-3870; Web site: http://www.ncte.org/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs: No Child Left Behind Act 2001
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A