ERIC Number: EJ1464069
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2025
Pages: 11
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-1043-4046
EISSN: EISSN-1522-1229
Available Date: 0000-00-00
Frontier Model Chatbots Can Help Instructors Create, Improve, and Use Learning Objectives
Gregory J. Crowther; Merrill D. Funk; Kelly M. Hennessey; Marcus M. Lawrence
Advances in Physiology Education, v49 n1 p219-229 2025
Learning objectives (LOs) are a pillar of course design and execution and thus a focus of curricular reforms. This study explored the extent to which the creation and usage of LOs might be facilitated by three leading chatbots: ChatGPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Google Gemini Advanced. We posed three main questions, as follows: "question A": when given course content, can chatbots create LOs that are consistent with five best practices in writing LOs?; "question B": when given LOs for a low level of the revised Bloom's taxonomy, can chatbots convert them to a higher level?; and "question C": when given LOs, can chatbots create assessment questions that meet six criteria of quality? We explored these questions in the context of four undergraduate courses: Applied Exercise Physiology, Human Anatomy, Human Physiology, and Motor Learning. According to instructor ratings, chatbots had a >70% success rate on most individual criteria for questions A--C. However, chatbots' "difficulties" with a few criteria (e.g., provision of appropriate context for an LO's action, assignment of an appropriate revised Bloom's taxonomy level) meant that, overall, only 38.3% of chatbot outputs fully met all criteria and thus were possibly ready for use with students. Our findings thus underscore the continuing need for instructor oversight of chatbot outputs but also illustrate chatbots' potential to expedite the design and improvement of LOs and LO-related curricular materials such as test question templates (TQTs), which directly align LOs with assessment questions.
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Learning Objectives, Technology Uses in Education, Curriculum Design, Curriculum Implementation, Best Practices, Evaluation Methods, Educational Quality, Undergraduate Study, Exercise Physiology, Anatomy, Perceptual Motor Learning, Taxonomy, Evaluation Criteria
American Physiological Society. 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3991. Tel: 301-634-7164; Fax: 301-634-7241; e-mail: webmaster@the-aps.org; Web site: https://www-physiology-org.bibliotheek.ehb.be/journal/advances
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research; Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: 1624200
Author Affiliations: N/A