NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1461664
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2023-Jun
Pages: 17
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-1866-2625
EISSN: EISSN-1866-2633
Available Date: 2023-02-24
Leader and Provider Perspectives on Implementing Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youth--Acute (Safety-A) in Public School Districts Serving Racial/Ethnic Minoritized Youth
Stephanie H. Yu1; Tamar Kodish1; Laurel Bear2; J. Conor O'Neill3; Joan R. Asarnow4; David B. Goldston5; Karli K. Cheng6; Xinran Wang1,7; Sylvanna M. Vargas1,4; Anna S. Lau1
School Mental Health, v15 n2 p583-599 2023
Racial/ethnic minoritized (REM) youth represent a high-risk group for suicide, yet there are striking disparities in their use of mental health services (MHS) even after risk is identified in schools. Prior research suggests that school-based risk assessments and hospitalization encounters can be negatively experienced by REM youth and families, thus deterring likelihood of seeking follow-up care. The Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youth--Acute (SAFETY-A) is a brief, strengths-based, cognitive-behavioral family intervention demonstrated to increase linkage to MHS when implemented in emergency departments. With its focus on strengths and family engagement, SAFETY-A may cultivate a positive therapeutic encounter suited to addressing disparities in MHS by enhancing trust and family collaboration, if appropriately adapted for schools. Thirty-seven school district leaders and frontline school MHS providers from districts serving primarily socioeconomically disadvantaged REM communities participated in key informant interviews and focus groups. First, interviews were conducted to understand usual care processes for responding to students with suicidal thoughts and behaviors and perspectives on the strengths and disadvantages of current practices. An "as-is" process analysis was used to describe current practices spanning risk assessment, crisis intervention, and follow-up. Second, focus groups were conducted to solicit perceptions of the fit of SAFETY-A for these school contexts. Thematic analysis of the interviews and focus groups was used to identify multilevel facilitators and barriers to SAFETY-A implementation and potential tailoring variables for implementation strategies across school districts.
Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link-springer-com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: U79SM080041; R34MH126670
Author Affiliations: 1University of California, Department of Psychology, Los Angeles, USA; 24 Successful Kids, LLC, Los Angeles, USA; 3Brightside Health, Durham, USA; 4University of California, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehaviorial Sciences, Los Angeles, USA; 5Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Durham, USA; 6Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Department of Neurology, Phoenix, USA; 7Vanderbilt University, Department of Psychology and Human Development, Nashville, USA