In March of 2020, the world encountered the COVID-19 pivot, an abrupt transition from in-person interactions to a socially distanced world. Within schools of engineering, this pivot meant a switch out of collaborative environments, including academic makerspaces. This research investigates how engineering faculty pivoted their instruction to account for the limited capacity, of an academic makerspace during the COVID-19 pivot. We interviewed four engineering faculty members in the United States who utilise the academic makerspace for a course project. Then, we used a descriptive case study approach to explore their perspectives on their instructional pivots. Using Henderson et al.'s ([2011]. "Facilitating Change in Undergraduate STEM Instructional Practices: An Analytic Review of Literature." "Journal of Research in Science Teaching" 48 (8): 952-984) theoretical framework of change strategies within undergraduate STEM education, we identify when and how each change strategy was used and discuss themes across the instruction pivots. These pivots provide real-world examples of instructional shifts that instructors implemented to differentiate, and in some cases change, their coursework to support inclusive learning environments.