We investigated university students' study of mathematics in the digital setting context of the COVID-19 pandemic. We gathered data from a survey of 89 students enrolled in a 'Linear Algebra 1' course including affective variables, learning strategies, social relatedness and resources considered useful. The results indicate students' high effort and self-regulation and a high variation in affective characteristics and social relatedness. All the traditional aspects of mathematics teaching (lecture, tutorials and lecture notes) were rated as particularly useful. In addition, the videos from external resources were rated as equally useful as the teaching team's videos. In contrast, traditional literature such as textbooks was rarely considered useful. The most useful resource rated was communication with peers, underlining the important role of social learning despite fully digital learning environments. Finally, a cluster analysis based on students' rated usefulness of the resources led to three different user-types. Whereas the 'digitals' find the external digital resources very useful (videos, webpages, etc.), the 'traditionalists' rate the digitalized traditional resources best (lecture, tutorials, etc.). All resources receive uniformly good ratings from a third group ('all resource users'). We reflect on our findings in light of the pandemic and describe directions for future research.