Asynchronous online discussion boards are frequently utilized as a pedagogical tool within traditional, hybrid, and online collegiate courses. Research has found teacher candidates can be disenchanted with the monotonous structure of traditional asynchronous online discussion boards. In educator preparation, we claim to understand teacher candidates learn differently. Yet, traditional discussion boards are not effective for all teacher candidates. Faculty can find ways to differentiate by incorporating alternative asynchronous discussion board platforms. A quantitative survey was used measure 77 teacher candidates perceptions of creativity, demonstrating understanding, enhancing student voice, and usefulness toward learning. Results indicate participants prefer BookSnaps, Flipgrid, and video-response to traditional discussion boards. More specifically when evaluating for enhancing creativity, understanding, student voice, and usefulness participants preferred Flipgrid. It is important to understand the factors, which create a high-quality asynchronous discussion board experience. This research can help faculty to determine how to strengthen the asynchronous online discussion board learning experience.