NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
ERIC Number: ED669335
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2020
Pages: 263
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 979-8-5355-9248-0
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: 0000-00-00
Attending to Uncertainty in the Design and Implementation of DGE Tasks to Engage Mathematics Students in Productive Struggle
Ashley Jairam
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
Struggling with mathematics is important for several reasons. According to learning theorists and empirical studies, the act of struggling can help students learn mathematics. Also, several important mathematics education documents advocate that students should engage in struggle as part of the problem-solving process. In addition, being able to struggle and persevere through struggle when solving problems is an essential skill for graduates to have as they pursue future employment. However, it may not be clear to mathematics teachers how to engage students in struggle and make and keep that struggle productive. Creating uncertainty for students could possibly be a means for engaging students in productive struggle, because of the close relationship between uncertainty and struggle. This study sought to engage students in productive struggle by engaging them in dynamic geometry tasks that elicit uncertainty. Dynamic geometry environments were chosen for their usefulness in creating and resolving uncertainties due to their exploration and feedback features. Eight mathematical tasks were chosen, modified, or designed in such a way as to elicit uncertainty. Uncertainty was to be created in two ways in the tasks, through competing claims and unknown paths/questionable conclusions. Classroom observations were conducted to observe secondary geometry students working on these tasks using the dynamic geometry environment, GeoGebra. This data was analyzed in such a way as to determine answers to the following questions: (a) Did the task create uncertainty?, (b) Did the uncertainty lead to struggle?, (c) What parts of the struggle were productive and what parts of the struggle were not productive?, and (d) What supported or hindered students' productive struggle? The tasks did create uncertainty, but this uncertainty did not always lead to students engaging in productive struggle. Even when students were faced with clear contradictions or questionable conclusions, they did not always seek out resolutions for these uncertainties. One possible explanation for why students did not seek out resolutions for these uncertainties is because they did not believe they possessed the mathematical authority to do so. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Secondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A