NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
ERIC Number: ED653771
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2024
Pages: 152
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 979-8-3824-0594-0
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
What They Say vs. What They Do: A Qualitative Analysis of Failed Racial Redress at Historically White Institutions
Ada Malcioln Martin
ProQuest LLC, Ed.D. Dissertation, The University of Arizona
Historically white institutions (HWIs) across the country are, in some way or another, working to address racial disparities within their organizations. As a part of campus diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts, DEI advocates work to examine ways to increase faculty and student recruitment and boost the retention of marginalized groups. At the same time, leaders continue to implement ineffective color evasive approaches that do nothing to change the institutional culture or dismantle its hegemonic systems (Wagner & Yee, 2011; Annamma et al., 2017). Instead, these efforts actively work to uphold and perpetuate white supremacy (Wagner & Yee, 2011). Despite attempts to remedy historical wrongs, institutions tend only to address racial inequities when white society feels those issues need confrontation (Bell, 1980). Often DEI in higher education consists of surface advancements while failing to delve deeper into the root cause of the racial disparities within these organizations (Tichavkunda, 2021). Using the scholarship of Derrick Bell from a CRT praxis, this research addresses the racial aspect of DEI work and how interest convergence (Bell, 1980) is the primary source of institutional DEI pushes. It will also examine how what Bell (1992) calls racial symbols limit progress by serving as a temporary salve intended to placate the masses while doing little to impact DEI efforts significantly. This work asks institutions and DEI advocates to examine how interest convergence operates in higher education. The main objective being for them to abolish racial symbolism, address institutional inequities (retention rates of Black and Latin faculty, staff, and students), and begin to center their marginalized voices. This work hopes to foster the creation of realistic programs and policies intended to promote tangible equitable outcomes actively aimed at disrupting white supremacist systems. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A