NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
ERIC Number: ED638716
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2023
Pages: 168
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 979-8-3803-9413-0
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
Exploring Culturally Responsive Equitable Problem-Solving Pedagogy: Theorizing, Developing & Teaching
Tisha Newton Jones
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, Old Dominion University
Achievement gaps in mathematics between middle and high school Black students when compared to their white peers exist in part because of access, but also because Black learners' brilliance is not recognized. Finding ways to help students, especially Black students, become successful mathematical problem solvers was a driving force behind this research. The purpose of this research is to explore ideas of how to improve Black students' opportunities to engage in effective mathematical problem solving to improve their mathematics understanding and achievement. This study introduces the Culturally Responsive Equitable Problem Solving (CREPS) pedagogy situated at the intersections of a conceptual framework comprised of three pedagogies - Gay's (2002) Culturally Responsive Pedagogy, Aguirre, Mayfield-Ingram, and Martin's (2013) Equity-Based Mathematics Practices, and Schroeder and Lester's (1989) Teaching "through" Problem-Solving. This dissertation study is guided by several research questions and reported through three separate, but related essays: (a) "Theorizing a Culturally Responsive Equitable Problem-Solving Pedagogy;" (b) "Developing Culturally Responsive Equitable Problem-Solving Pedagogical Knowledge;" and (c) "Cases of Exemplary Instances of Teaching Culturally Responsive Equitable Problem-Solving Pedagogy." These three essays introduce and explain the tenets of CREPS pedagogy, examine secondary mathematics teachers' culturally responsive teaching readiness and their professional learning of CREPS through CREPS pedagogy, and identify instances of exemplary CREPS pedagogical teaching during lesson study (i.e., collaborative planning and iterative teaching of a CREPS lesson), respectively. There were several findings from this research. The most salient findings were the three CREPS pedagogical moves: (a) development of deep mathematics understanding; (b) acknowledgement of students' backgrounds; and (c) employment of equitable pedagogical practices. Several ideas for future research are shared related to refining and testing the CREPS pedagogy, developing teachers' CREPS pedagogical knowledge, and teaching experiments for enacting CREPS pedagogy. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: Secondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A