ERIC Number: ED604710
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2019
Pages: 107
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 978-1-3923-0004-6
ISSN: EISSN-
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
Comparing the Cost and Outcomes of E-Rate Programs in Nebraska: Policy Recommendations for Nebraska Administrators
Wolfe, Diane
ProQuest LLC, Ed.D. Dissertation, University of South Dakota
This study examined the impact of the federal E-rate program on four Nebraska school districts to determine whether there is a significant cost difference for telecommunication charges as well as E-rate discount awards available to Nebraska school districts. The research design utilizes a comparative case study to gauge the changes over time in data transport charges and E-rate awards among four Nebraska school districts identified as either High-Cost/High-Poverty; High-Cost/Low-Poverty; Low-Cost/High-Poverty; and Low-Cost/Low-Poverty to determine cost effective models of E-rate support. In addition to quantitative analysis, interviews were conducted with representatives of the four Nebraska school districts to obtain information regarding outcomes of, and problems with, E-rate funding. There was a statistically significant difference in percentage of discounts among the different school districts as well as a statistically significant difference in charges between the different districts. With regard to charge, High Cost/High Poverty District has the highest mean rank (42.25) while Low Cost/Low Poverty District has the lowest mean rank (25.86). Regarding amount awarded, High Cost/High Poverty District has the highest mean rank (44.03), while Low Cost/Low Poverty District has the lowest mean rank (23.31). Three themes emerged from the interviews: E-rate support is perceived to increase equity; E-rate support is perceived to enhance student achievement; ESU expertise is perceived as an advantage of the E-rate program. The low cost of ESU support is perceived as an advantage of the E-rate program. This study supports that in the case of Nebraska districts, cost-effectiveness of E-rate support models may not be the primary concern for the districts, but rather, trust in E-rate support personnel is a more important factor when selecting E-rate support. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
Descriptors: Costs, Federal Programs, Telecommunications, School Districts, Federal Aid, Cost Effectiveness, Financial Support, Institutional Characteristics, Equal Education, Academic Achievement
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com.bibliotheek.ehb.be/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: Nebraska
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A