Peer assessment has proven to be a useful strategy for increasing the timeliness and quantity of formative feedback, as well as for promoting metacognitive thinking among students. Previous research has determined that reviews that contain suggestions can motivate students to revise and improve their work. This paper describes a method for automatically detecting suggestions in review text. The quantity of suggestions can be treated as a metric for the helpfulness of review text. Even before a review is submitted, the system can tell a reviewer when a review is lacking in suggestions and consequently advise that they be added. This paper presents several neural-network approaches for detecting suggestions and compares them against traditional natural language processing (NLP) methods such as rule-based techniques, as well as past machine-learning approaches. Our network-based classifiers outperformed rule-based classifiers in every experiment. Our neural-network classifiers attained F1- scores in the low 90% range, outperforming the support vector machine (SVM) classifier whose F1-score was 88%. The naïve Bayes (NB) classifier had an F1-score of 84% and the rule-based classifier had an F1-score of 80%. As in other domains such as determining sentiment, we found that neural-network models perform better than the likes of naïve Bayes and support vector machines when classifying suggestions in text. [For the full proceedings, see ED599096.]