As part of the educational planning process, the Oregon State Board of Higher Education requested this review of alternative models for the Oregon University System (OUS). Staff of the Board of Higher Education synthesized existing literature on the variety of U.S. higher education governance structures, including newer models such as the public corporation, and described other recent developments in governance. Review findings show that 23 states have consolidated governing boards, similar to the current Oregon Board. Twenty-five states have coordinating boards, with more limited authority than consolidated boards. Some of these boards are advisory; others are regulatory with more authority for program approval. Seven states were selected to illustrate the various ways in which governance responsibilities are delegated. The strengths and weaknesses of the two major governance structures are discussed, and the public corporation model, which has been implemented by one Oregon institution and several other higher education systems, is described. The experiences of other states, including Florida and West Virginia, in developing new models of governance for higher education, are outlined. (Contains 11 tables and 47 references.) (SLD)