The fundamental concern of the roundtable on which this essay is based was the world of scholarship's ability to sustain and develop a system of scholarly communication that makes individual contributions to the knowledge base broadly accessible for judgment within and among the academic disciplines. The focus was on the disciplines that have traditionally made the library, as opposed to the laboratory, their home. Society has come to value the products of the sciences more highly than those of the humanities and social sciences. Scholarly publication, whether digital or print, is a complex process that involves a range of players. This essay makes some suggestions for the dissemination of scholarly work, including broadening the conception of the audience, that scholarly work in the humanities and the social sciences should address. The potential for technology to expand those who can benefit from scholarly materials and the materials that can be made available should be explored. The essay calls for the preservation of peer review, increased partnerships among different stakeholders, better education about copyright and related issues, and new models for meeting the costs of scholarly communication and publication. (SLD)