A consideration of the arts and cultural life is indispensable to any study of the quality of life in U.S. metropolitan areas. However, literature reviews reveal that the arts are often omitted in quality of life studies, and, if included, the assessment may not be derived from sound empirical analysis. This document describes and evaluates "The Places Rated Almanac" ranking variables and measurements of metropolitan arts based on the availability of: (1) museums; (2) public radio; (3) public television; (4) colleges and universities; (5) symphony orchestras; (6) theaters; (7) opera companies; (8) dance companies; and (9) public libraries. An alternative ranking system, based on the National Metropolitan Area Study (NMAS) is described. Strengths and weaknesses in the arts in the Florence (Alabama) metropolitan area are discussed, along with suggestions for improvements and private sector assistance. Suggestions for future research concerning arts availability and observations are made about metropolitan area ranks for the arts. Four tables compare the "Places Rated Almanac" and NMAS ranks for U.S. metropolitan areas above 100,000 population levels, and an appendix defines revised standards for metropolitan statistical areas. (JHP)