Peer review of college faculty is discussed from the perspective of an administrator who reviews promotion and tenure documents at the central university level. Attention is directed to: the rationale for peer review, qualities of an effective teacher, sources of information available to colleagues, an example of a peer review system at The Ohio State University's (OSU) Faculty of Management and Human Resources, and a suggestion for needed research. At OSU, faculty are advised to base their opinions of colleagues on: (1) visiting classes and lectures presented to the public or professional societies; (2) review of documents such as syllabi, term papers, reading lists, and examinations; (3) development by the candidate of new and effective techniques of instruction and instructional materials; (4) review of publications by the candidate on the teaching of appropriate discipline in respected journals devoted to pedagogy; (5) recognitions or awards for distinguished teaching; and (6) review of the opinions of graduates who have achieved professional success, and the number and caliber of students guided in research by the candidate. A primary concern is that the information on candidates be valid and reliable, and that the process is fair. (SW)