This symposium included four papers about the administration of the evaluation of Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I projects. The first speaker, Janice K. Anderson, presented a summary of efforts to coordinate evaluations so as to promote sufficient uniformity for generalizations across local programs, but permitting maximim local initiative. Ronald L. Fishbein described the process by which eight regional Technical Assistance Centers were set up, and how they established relationships with the state and local education agencies, and provided the services that were requested. The third paper, by David L. Donovan and Daniel E. Schooley, suggested that state education agencies did not have sufficient influence in planning Title I programs. The authors suggested a national testing program or a program similar to the Michigan Educational Assessment Test or the National Assessment of Educational Progress. The last speaker, Carl Novak, supported the use of Normal Curve Equivalency Scores, and spoke of the valuable assistance provided by the technical assistance centers. (Author/CTM) Aspect of National Assessment (NAEP) dealt with in this document: Program Description.