ERIC Number: ED095279
Record Type: RIE
Publication Date: 1974
Pages: 123
Abstractor: N/A
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
Evaluation of the Availability and Effectiveness of MDTA Institutional Training and Employment Services for Women: Reanalysis of the MDTA Outcomes Study.
Walker, Yvonne Kimmons; And Others
The document represents an integral part of a study undertaken as an evaluation of the impact of institutional training on women. The re-analysis of data for the Manpower Development Training Act (MDTA) Outcome Study, using measures such as job placement, length of training, post-training income, and the completion of training, indicates that in some ways the MDTA training has been at least as successful for women as men. These ways include: (1) females were more likely than males to use their acquired training in post-training employment (females-62 percent, males-39 percent), (2) females experienced highest incremental earnings across all training periods and occupational categories (females-$968, males-$692), (3) more female trainees (39 percent) than male trainees (32 percent) felt that MDTA training helped them get a job. In the following areas of the traiing program women did not fare as well: (1) a larger percentage of females (15 percent) than males (9 percent) were found to have reported no post-training earnings, and (2) females showed a lower correlation than males between months in training and large salary increases. (MW)
Descriptors: Adult Programs, Comparative Analysis, Educational Assessment, Employed Women, Employment Patterns, Employment Statistics, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Institutional Role, Job Development, Job Training, Labor Force Development, Program Evaluation, Sex Discrimination, Tables (Data), Trainees, Vocational Education, Vocational Training Centers, Womens Education
Publication Type: Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: N/A
Sponsor: Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC. Office of Planning, Budgeting, and Evaluation.
Authoring Institution: Battle (Mark) Associates, Inc., Washington, DC.; Exotech Systems, Inc., Falls Church, VA.
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A
Note: For related documents, see CE 001 826 and 828