DISSERTATIONS, THESES, STAFF STUDIES, PERSONAL RESEARCH, PERIODICAL ARTICLES, YEARBOOKS, AND SPEECHES FROM 1960 TO 1966 ARE REVIEWED. TOPICS DISCUSSED ARE (1) PHILOSOPHY AND OBJECTIVES, (2) CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT, (3) INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS AND DEVICES, (4) LEARNING PROCESSES AND TEACHING METHODS, (5) STUDENT PERSONNEL SERVICES, (6) FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT, (7) TEACHER EDUCATION, (8) ADMINISTRATION AND SUPERVISION, (9) EVALUATION, AND (10) RESEARCH. THE AUTHOR CONCLUDED THAT EXCELLENT EXAMPLES OF RESEARCH EXIST IN EXPERIMENTAL WORK, IN FOLLOWUP RESEARCH EMPLOYING CAUSAL-COMPARATIVE METHODS, AND IN SOME PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES. HOWEVER, MUCH OF THE RESEARCH DONE BECAUSE OF DEGREE REQUIREMENTS WAS THOUGHT TO BE OF EXTREMELY POOR QUALITY. BY ACCEPTING LOW QUALITY STANDARDS, INSTITUTIONS MAY BE PRODUCING INDIVIDUALS WHO ERRONEOUSLY CONCEIVE THEMSELVES ABLE AND ACCOMPLISHED RESEARCHERS. MAJOR QUESTIONS CONCERN INDUSTRIAL ARTS OBJECTIVES AND TEACHING METHODOLOGY. RESEARCH EFFORTS, IN THE NEAR FUTURE AT LEAST, WILL BE DIRECTED TO THE CONCERNS RAISED BY THE MAJOR CURRICULUM PROJECTS. (EM)