Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 5 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 53 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 155 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 553 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 37 |
| Popham, W. James | 30 |
| Ediger, Marlow | 15 |
| Roid, Gale | 12 |
| Baker, Eva L. | 11 |
| Wilcox, Rand R. | 11 |
| Berk, Ronald A. | 10 |
| Haladyna, Tom | 10 |
| Livingston, Samuel A. | 10 |
| Millman, Jason | 10 |
| Nitko, Anthony J. | 10 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 255 |
| Teachers | 141 |
| Researchers | 99 |
| Administrators | 31 |
| Policymakers | 17 |
| Parents | 13 |
| Community | 9 |
| Students | 6 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Georgia | 85 |
| Australia | 50 |
| Florida | 36 |
| Missouri | 31 |
| Texas | 28 |
| Canada | 24 |
| Oklahoma | 18 |
| Illinois | 17 |
| United States | 17 |
| South Carolina | 16 |
| California | 15 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Does not meet standards | 5 |
Neel, Thomas E. – Thrust for Education Leadership, 1972
Analysis of three evaluation systems: 1) norm referenced achievement tests; 2) criterion referenced evaluation; 3) norm-based tests as criterion instruments. (Author/SP)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Legislation, Formative Evaluation, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedProger, Barton B.; Mann, Lester – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1973
Discussed is the application of criterion referenced measurement techniques to the learning program of the learning disabled elementary school child. (DB)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary School Students, Exceptional Child Education, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedMartin, John D.; Rudolph, Linda – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
The SIT Correlates highly enough with ACT scores to be considered a valid instrument for predicting acceptance and success in college. (Authors)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Grade Point Average, Intelligence Tests
Peer reviewedMhlaba, Sondlo L. – College Student Journal, 1972
It was the author's purpose in this short discussion to suggest that testing and grading should help the student learn better without excessive pressure of time or competition. (Author)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Diagnostic Tests, Grading, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedSaylor, Galen – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
The author assesses the contributions to educational planning of the National Assessment of Education Progress. He gives examples of the findings and asks questions as to how they can be utilized by school systems. (Editor) Aspect of National Assessment (NAEP) dealt with in this document: Results (Utilization).
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Decision Making, Educational Objectives, Educational Planning
van den Brink, Wulfert – Evaluation in Education: International Progress, 1982
Binomial models for domain-referenced testing are compared, emphasizing the assumptions underlying the beta-binomial model. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed. A proposed item sampling model is presented which takes the effect of guessing into account. (Author/CM)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Criterion Referenced Tests, Item Sampling, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewedBergquist, Constance C. – Exceptional Children, 1982
Criterion-referenced tests in a time-series design were found to be the most feasible methodology for evaluating placement in an early intervention program for mildly retarded, learning disabled, and emotionally disturbed children. Advantages included provision of longitudinal data, while the major disadvantage was administration time. (CL)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Emotional Disturbances, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedFarley, Frank H.; And Others – Educational Researcher, 1982
Presents predictions made by past presidents of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) on the future of educational research, includinq the emergence of new research methods; improvement of existing measures; changes within AERA; developments in school populations, testing, and funding; new conceptions of intelligence and aptitude;…
Descriptors: Aptitude, Child Development, Criterion Referenced Tests, Educational Research
Peer reviewedCantor, Gordon N.; And Others – American Educational Research Journal, 1982
Two instructional methods, reception and discovery, together with a control condition, were compared in terms of their effects on the performances of kindergarten children (n=72) on probability tasks. Evidence for the superiority of discovery learning was not forthcoming. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Discovery Learning, Early Childhood Education, Kindergarten Children
Peer reviewedKazanas, H. C.; Frazier, E. L. – Journal of Studies in Technical Careers, 1982
Compares the effects of a performance-based instructional approach and the traditional lecture-discussion method on initial achievement and retention of students in a secondary level electricity/electronics course. Neither method appears to be significantly better in terms of student performance or attitude. (SK)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Competency Based Education, Criterion Referenced Tests, Electricity
Peer reviewedCziko, Gary A. – TESOL Quarterly, 1982
Describes an attempt to construct an ESL dictation test that would: (1) be appropriate for a wide range of ability, (2) be easy and fast to score, (3) consist of set items that would form both a unidimensional and cumulative scale, and (4) yield scores that would be directly interpretable with respect to specified levels of English proficiency.…
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, English (Second Language), Higher Education, Scores
Peer reviewedHaladyna, Tom – Educational Leadership, 1982
Describes two types of criterion-referenced testing that districts can use to measure achievement outcomes of their instructional programs: a random sampling assessment plan and an item-response theory assessment plan. (Author/JM)
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Criterion Referenced Tests, Elementary Secondary Education, Item Sampling
Peer reviewedCurlette, William L.; Stallings, William M. – Clearing House, 1979
The 10 criticisms of criterion-referenced tests addressed in this paper are: the domains tested; pedagogical influence; difficulty of items; cumbersome reports; reliability; arbitrary criteria; local objectives; labeling; predictive validity; and repeated testing. (SJL)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Cutting Scores, Elementary Secondary Education, Mastery Tests
Peer reviewedWilcox, Rand R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
The paper considers the problem of selecting the t best of k normal populations and simultaneously determining whether the selected populations have a mean larger than a known standard. Illustrations are given for selecting the t best of k examinees when the binomial error model applies. (Author)
Descriptors: Competitive Selection, Criterion Referenced Tests, Decision Making, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewedGanopole, Selina J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1980
The fundamental Reading Competencies Test assesses proficiency with respect to well-defined functional reading skills of high school students. Validity and reliability data for the test are presented. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Functional Reading, High Schools, Minimum Competency Testing


