Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 75 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 510 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1085 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2604 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 169 |
| Practitioners | 49 |
| Teachers | 32 |
| Administrators | 8 |
| Policymakers | 8 |
| Counselors | 4 |
| Students | 4 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 174 |
| Australia | 81 |
| Canada | 79 |
| China | 72 |
| United States | 56 |
| Taiwan | 44 |
| Germany | 43 |
| Japan | 41 |
| United Kingdom | 39 |
| Iran | 37 |
| Indonesia | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 1 |
Peer reviewedLee, Young B.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Data Analysis, Item Analysis, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewedKohr, Richard L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Computer Programs, Item Analysis, Rating Scales
Webster, William J.; McLeod, Gordon K. – Educ, 1970
A system designed to plan and empirically validate an advanced program for elementary and secondary education is presented. (CK)
Descriptors: Curriculum Design, Educational Objectives, Educational Programs, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedDujovne, Beatriz E.; Levy, Bernard I. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Item Analysis, Memory, Rating Scales
Peer reviewedClark, William H.; Margolis, Bruce L. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Biographical Inventories, Data Analysis, Item Analysis, Scoring
Peer reviewedFischer, Frederick E. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1970
The personalbiserial index is a correlation which measures the relationship between the difficulty of the items in a test for the person, as evidenced by this passes and failures, and the difficulty of the items as evidenced by group-determined item difficulties. Reliability and predictive validity are studiesstudied. (Author/RF)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Item Analysis, Predictive Measurement, Predictor Variables
Peer reviewedMenne, John W.; Tolsma, Robert J. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Group Testing, Item Analysis, Psychometrics
Begley, Carl E.; and others – J Clin Psychol, 1970
The results of a questionnaire suggested that therapists and patients do not view therapy within the same frame of reference. (CK)
Descriptors: Attitudes, Cluster Grouping, Item Analysis, Patients
Peer reviewedIngils, Chester R. – Clearing House, 1970
Evaluation of the attainment of educational objectives and the behavioral development of the learner would be sufficient evaluation of the qualities of the teaching he received. (CK)
Descriptors: Administrators, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Criteria, Item Analysis
Peer reviewedRozeboom, William W. – Psychometrika, 1982
Bounds for the multiple correlation of common factors with the items which comprise those factors are developed. It is then shown that under broad, but not completely general, conditions, the circumstances under which an infinite item domain does or does not perfectly determine selected subsets of its common factors. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Factor Analysis, Item Analysis, Multiple Regression Analysis, Test Items
Peer reviewedCressie, Noel; Holland, Paul W. – Psychometrika, 1983
The problem of characterizing the manifest probabilities of a latent trait model is considered. The approach taken here differs from the standard approach in that a population of examinees is being considered as opposed to a single examinee. Particular attention is given to the Rasch model. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Guessing (Tests), Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory, Mathematical Models
Peer reviewedMelzer, Charles W.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
The magnitude of statistical bias for the phi-coefficient was investigated, using computer simulated examinations in which all the students had equal knowledge. Several modifications of phi were tested, but when applied to real examinations, none succeeded in improving its reproducibility when items are re-used on equivalent student groups.…
Descriptors: Correlation, Item Analysis, Mathematical Models, Multiple Choice Tests
Peer reviewedNishisato, Shizuhiko; Sheu, Wen-Jenn – Psychometrika, 1980
A modification of the method of reciprocal averages for scaling multiple choice data is proposed. The proposed method handles the data in a piecewise fashion and allows for faster convergence to a solution. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Item Analysis, Measurement Techniques, Multiple Choice Tests, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedHarris, Chester W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
Brennan's B statistic is a generalized upper-lower discrimination index which was first published in 1972: Peirce earlier introduced a statistic on the relation between a predictor and an outcome which has the same structure as Brennan's B. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Item Analysis, Mathematical Formulas, Predictive Measurement
Peer reviewedSilverstein, A. B. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
An alternative derivation was given of Gaylord's formulas showing the relationships among the average item intercorrelation, the average item-test correlation, and test reliability. Certain parallels were also noted in analysis of variance and principal component analysis. (Author)
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Item Analysis, Mathematical Formulas, Test Reliability


