Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 3 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 43 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 606 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3463 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Thompson, Bruce | 43 |
| Slate, John R. | 13 |
| Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. | 12 |
| Goldhaber, Dan | 11 |
| Levin, Joel R. | 11 |
| Hedges, Larry V. | 9 |
| Newman, Isadore | 9 |
| Games, Paul A. | 8 |
| Aiken, Lewis R. | 7 |
| Daniel, Larry G. | 7 |
| Levy, Kenneth J. | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 88 |
| Teachers | 22 |
| Practitioners | 13 |
| Policymakers | 10 |
| Administrators | 6 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Media Staff | 2 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
| Turkey | 162 |
| Texas | 157 |
| Jordan | 85 |
| California | 80 |
| United States | 75 |
| Australia | 61 |
| Florida | 59 |
| Saudi Arabia | 52 |
| Tennessee | 48 |
| North Carolina | 45 |
| Canada | 44 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 14 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 23 |
| Does not meet standards | 25 |
Newman, Isadore; Fraas, John W.; Herbert, Alan – 2001
Statistical significance and practical significance can be considered jointly through the use of non-nil null hypotheses that are based on values deemed to be practically significant. When examining differences between the means of two groups, researchers can use a randomization test or an independent t test. The issue addressed in this paper is…
Descriptors: Groups, Hypothesis Testing, Monte Carlo Methods, Statistical Significance
Lane, Ginny G. – 1999
For years, researchers have debated the misinterpretation of the null hypothesis significance test (NHST). Many researchers overemphasize the results of the NHST and underemphasize or even omit effect size measures. This paper addresses the common mistaken perceptions regarding the NHST. Several common effect size estimates are discussed. A small…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Hypothesis Testing, Research Methodology, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewedSmith, Robert A.; And Others – Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974
Descriptors: Computer Programs, Hypothesis Testing, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewedBedford, Crayton W. – Mathematics Teacher, 1972
The Wilcoxon two-sample test used to examine judge bias. (MM)
Descriptors: Bias, Mathematics, Probability, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewedSachdeva, Darshan – Journal of Experimental Education, 1971
This paper provides the computational formulas necessary for testing the significance of the difference between mean values of two bivariate normal populations. (Author)
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Measurement Techniques, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewedParker, Randall M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Computer Programs, Probability, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewedCross, Edward M.; Chaffin, Wilkie W. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1982
It is suggested that the binomial theorem be used to compute the probability that a given number of Type I errors would occur when a group of null hypotheses are true and that this result be used as the level of significance for the test of an overall hypothesis. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Research Problems, Statistical Analysis, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewedHsu, Louis M. – Educational Researcher, 1980
Criticizes an article in which S. A. Cohen and J. S. Hyman describe as "suspicious" the high proportion of statistically significant findings reported in published educational research journals and offers alternative explanations for the high statistical power reported. (GC)
Descriptors: Educational Research, Periodicals, Research Methodology, Sampling
Peer reviewedTsutakawa, Robert K. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1978
A Bayesian solution is presented for the Johnson-Neyman problem (whether or not the distance between two regression lines is statistically significant over a finite interval of the independent variable). (Author/CTM)
Descriptors: Bayesian Statistics, Regression (Statistics), Statistical Significance, Technical Reports
Peer reviewedStamm, Carol Lee – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1978
A study was conducted using generated data sets that contained specified amounts of error to determine empirically which of two large sample approximations for the coefficient of concordance or weighted average tau was more appropriate for various numbers of judges and numbers of objects. (CTM)
Descriptors: Correlation, Nonparametric Statistics, Sampling, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewedSnijders, Tom A. B. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1996
Two commentaries describe some shortcomings of a recent discussion of the significance testing of R-squared by C. J. Huberty and upward bias in the statistic. Both propose some modifications. A response by Huberty acknowledges the importance of the exchange of ideas in the field of data analysis. (SLD)
Descriptors: Bias, Correlation, Effect Size, Regression (Statistics)
Peer reviewedWest, Leonard J. – Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 1990
Identifies the common supposition in research by business educators that a research outcome that is statistically significant is necessarily practically significant. Describes the use and interpretation of a simple objective measure of practical significance, called Effect Size. (Author)
Descriptors: Business Education, Effect Size, Research Utilization, Statistical Significance
Peer reviewedHaase, Richard F.; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1989
Contends that tests of statistical significance and measures of magnitude in counseling psychology research do not provide same information. Argues interpreting magnitude of experimental effects must be two-stage decision process with the second stage of process being conditioned on results of a test of statistical significance and entailing…
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Research Needs, Statistical Significance, Test Interpretation
Peer reviewedReichardt, Charles S.; Gollob, Harry F. – Evaluation Review, 1989
The estimate-and-subtract method for eliminating threats to validity is described. It is argued that the method is superior to the use of no-difference findings for this purpose. Two ways of improving the no-difference findings are presented. (TJH)
Descriptors: Error of Measurement, Estimation (Mathematics), Statistical Significance, Validity
Peer reviewedShaw, W. M., Jr. – Information Processing and Management, 1990
Investigates the presence of clustering structure in a document collection and the influence of the presence of clustering structure on the success of cluster-based retrieval. Term-weight and similarity thresholds are discussed, empirical and statistical significance are considered, and indexing exhaustivity for document representation is…
Descriptors: Cluster Grouping, Documentation, Indexing, Information Retrieval


