Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 117 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 607 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1401 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2570 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| Follman, John | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 436 |
| Administrators | 99 |
| Researchers | 50 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 107 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 70 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDavenport, Derek – Journal of Chemical Education, 1975
Criticizes post-Sputnik changes in college chemistry instruction, including the tendency to assign higher grades and the teaching of difficult material beyond the students's ability. (MLH)
Descriptors: Chemistry, College Science, Educational Responsibility, Grading
Follman, John; Panther, Edward – Child Study Journal Monographs, 1974
Examines empirically the efficacy of utilizing Olympic diving and gymnastic scoring systems for grading graduate students' English compositions. Results indicated that such scoring rules do not produce ratings different in reliability or in level from conventional letter grades. (ED)
Descriptors: English Curriculum, Evaluation Methods, Grading, Graduate Students
NCTE Commission on Composition – Elementary English, 1975
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Dialects, Educational Objectives, Grading
Fox, Kathleen V. – 1988
A comparison was made between scores and grades of college students taking a development and learning course, using either a modified mastery grading system (MMGS) or a modified norm-referenced grading system (MNRGS). Under the MMGS, students could take each unit exam up to three times to meet minimum or higher criteria levels. Under the MNRGS,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Grading, Higher Education, Mastery Tests
Butler, Simon – Teaching History, 2004
In this article, Simon Butler advances a strong case for "comments only" marking. Good assessment, he argues, is about encouraging students to reflect on their current performance and take responsibility for their own progress. Assigning Levels to pupils' work is often justified in terms of the generation of targets which help to…
Descriptors: History Instruction, Grading, Secondary School Students, Student Evaluation
Mundy, C. Jean – Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 1974
Descriptors: Classification, Competency Based Education, Course Objectives, Evaluation
Miller, Gerald David – Improving College and University Teaching, 1974
Discusses a program in which the instructor "buys" work from his students for grades. Four pieces of work are required of the student for the semester. Each successive piece of work requires more independent thought, and successfully completed, results in a higher grade. (Author/PG)
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Educational Innovation, Grades (Scholastic), Grading
Wolvin, Andrew D.; Wolvin, Darlyn R. – Speech Teacher, 1975
Provides a course contract, syllabus, and evaluation sheet for use in a college technical communication course. (MH)
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Evaluation Methods, Grading, Higher Education
Ray, Dennis M. – Teaching Political Science, 1975
Description of a simulation that uses the Tachai system for determining students' grades on their participation and oral reports in a graduate seminar on contemporary China. (ND)
Descriptors: Asian Studies, Grading, Higher Education, International Relations
Peer reviewedSwadener, Marc; Wright, D. Franklin – Mathematics Teacher, 1975
Discussed are the purposes of testing, the construction of different types of test items, grading, and statistical analysis of test scores. (JP)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Grading
Boyle, Richard P. – Sociol Educ, 1969
Research supported by the Iowa Urban Community Research Center.
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Creativity, Grading, Input Output
Peer reviewedMcNamara, James F.; Keyes, Erma D. – Clearing House, 1969
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Grade Equivalent Scores, Grading, Measurement
Eddinger, Judith – Grade Teacher, 1969
Descriptors: Grading, Parent Teacher Conferences, Program Effectiveness, Report Cards
Peer reviewedKindsvatter, Richard – Clearing House, 1969
Descriptors: Educational Philosophy, Educational Problems, Educational Theories, Grading
Lotto, Edward; Smith, Bruce – 1979
Two teachers have developed a procedure for grading student compositions that seems fairer to both them and their students. The students are given a choice of which papers they wish to submit for grading, and when they do submit work, the papers are identified by a number only (chosen by the student and indexed in a class card file). Each teacher…
Descriptors: Grading, Higher Education, Informal Assessment, Student Evaluation

Direct link
