Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 2 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 18 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 42 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 127 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 28 |
| Teachers | 17 |
| Researchers | 13 |
| Administrators | 10 |
| Policymakers | 4 |
| Community | 3 |
| Students | 3 |
| Counselors | 2 |
Location
| Canada | 12 |
| United Kingdom | 8 |
| California | 7 |
| Australia | 6 |
| Germany | 6 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 6 |
| Israel | 5 |
| Japan | 5 |
| Illinois | 4 |
| United States | 4 |
| India | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedKimberly, James C. – Small Group Behavior, 1986
Reviews Bale's view on relations between instrumental and expressive structures and ensuing work on legitimacy of instrumental structure. Conceptualizes this legitimacy in terms of integration of distribution of members' skills and instrumental structure. Discusses Bale's conception of primary and secondary differentiation and inequality…
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Justice, Leadership Styles
Peer reviewedSaltmarsh, Robert E.; And Others – Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 1986
Describes a practical conceptualization of group process and management, titled the TRAC model (tasking, relating, acquiring, contacting), which takes into consideration the changing nature of group life. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Counseling, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Models
Peer reviewedFuhriman, Addie; And Others – Small Group Behavior, 1984
Presents problems associated with process analysis with a specific focus on definitional and methodological concerns. Discusses the need for a comprehensive system that will help researchers to separate and comprehend the individual parts of a group and their relationship to the whole group. (Author/LLL)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interaction Process Analysis
Peer reviewedBoulton, Michael J.; Smith, Peter K. – Child Development, 1990
In two classes of 8 year olds and 2 classes of 11 year olds, each child ranked all members of his or her class in terms of degree to which classmate was strong and liked. Subjects consistently overestimated their place in the hierarchy in relation to peers' perceptions. Bias in perceptions of strength extended to peer group. (RH)
Descriptors: Affective Behavior, Bias, Children, Group Structure
Burns, Amy Capwell – Communication Teacher, 2007
The objective of the exercise described here is to teach students about group formation using group concepts and theory. It also provides a unique way to form work groups for class projects. Students will become more aware of the reasons people join groups, the benefits groups provide for them, and an understanding of how groups are formed. The…
Descriptors: Teamwork, Group Activities, Teaching Methods, Cooperative Learning
Peer reviewedMcGuire, John M.; And Others – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1986
Investigated the role of a group structuring technique on the amount and depth of process involvement in two counseling training groups. The results partly supported the conclusion that early structure significantly affects process involvement among group members. Additionally, both groups showed strong gains in depth of process involvement over…
Descriptors: Counselor Training, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Interpersonal Competence
Peer reviewedLindsay, John S. B. – Human Relations, 1976
The fact that a group may subdivide into smaller subgroups is examined in the light of probability theory. (Author)
Descriptors: Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Organization Size (Groups), Probability
Peer reviewedTorrance, E. Paul – Elementary School Journal, 1971
In summary, the results suggest that, with five-year-old children, more might be gained by structuring the task than by structuring the group." (Author)
Descriptors: Aggression, Child Psychology, Group Behavior, Group Structure
Peer reviewedPheysey, Diana C.; And Others – Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971
This study explored the relationships between organizational structure and organizational climate on two levels -- the whole organization and the groups within it. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrators, Group Structure, Organization, Organizational Climate
Peer reviewedBaillie, Richard D. – School Science and Mathematics, 1971
Descriptors: Algebra, Chemistry, Group Structure, Groups
Peer reviewedMiller, James G. – Behavioral Science, 1971
Descriptors: Behavior Theories, Group Structure, Information Theory, Systems Approach
Peer reviewedDiener, Ed; And Others – Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980
Descriptors: College Students, Group Dynamics, Group Structure, Influences
Keyton, Joann; Beck, Stephenson J. – Business Communication Quarterly, 2008
This article proposes a pedagogical framework to help students analyze their group and team interactions. Intersecting five fundamental group attributes (group size, group goal, group member interdependence, group structure, and group identity) with three overarching group processes (leadership, decision making, and conflict management) creates an…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Group Structure, Group Dynamics, Teamwork
Hijzen, Daphne; Boekaerts, Monique; Vedder, Paul – Learning and Instruction, 2007
Previous research suggested that social support, belongingness and mastery goals were related to the quality of cooperative learning (CL). In this in-depth study we explored how to differentiate between four effective CL teams and four ineffective CL teams, in terms of students' goals and perceptions of instructional conditions. Apart from the…
Descriptors: Cooperative Learning, Social Responsibility, Teaching Methods, Student Motivation
Voci, Alberto; Hewstone, Miles; Crisp, Richard J.; Rubin, Mark – Social Psychology Quarterly, 2008
We investigated the effects of gender and group size on perceptions of group variability, using groups of students taking different majors that varied in the proportion of men and women (female-majority, parity, and male-majority). We found that both group size and gender had consistent effects on perceived out-group variability, even when…
Descriptors: Majors (Students), Class Size, Females, Familiarity

Direct link
