Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 9 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 39 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 81 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 217 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Levin, Joel R. | 17 |
| Smeets, Paul M. | 11 |
| Ghatala, Elizabeth S. | 9 |
| Klausmeier, Herbert J. | 9 |
| Spiker, Charles C. | 9 |
| Cantor, Joan H. | 8 |
| Gholson, Barry | 7 |
| Goulet, L. R. | 7 |
| Reed, Phil | 7 |
| Schreibman, Laura | 7 |
| Siegel, Alexander W. | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 70 |
| Practitioners | 23 |
| Teachers | 7 |
Location
| Australia | 8 |
| Canada | 7 |
| Ohio | 5 |
| Spain | 5 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 4 |
| Brazil | 2 |
| France | 2 |
| Massachusetts | 2 |
| Mexico | 2 |
| Netherlands | 2 |
| New York | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
Karpf, David; Levine, Marvin – Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Hypothesis Testing, Task Performance
Daly, Helen Bohmar – Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Learning Theories, Task Performance
Frankel, Fred; And Others – J Exp Psychol, 1970
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Hypothesis Testing, Task Performance
Peer reviewedWilton, R. N.; Godbout, R. C. – British Journal of Psychology, 1970
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Inhibition, Responses, Stimulus Devices
Carkhuff, Robert R.; and others – J Clin Psychol, 1969
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Discrimination Learning, Generalization
Lubker, Bonnie J. – Child Develop, 1969
Descriptors: Children, Discrimination Learning, Problem Solving, Training
Baeyens, Frank; Vervliet, Bram; Vansteenwegen, Debora; Beckers, Tom; Hermans, Dirk; Eelen, Paul – Learning and Motivation, 2004
Using a conditioned suppression task, we investigated simultaneous (XA-/A+) vs. sequential (X [right arrow] A-/A+) Feature Negative (FN) discrimination learning in humans. We expected the simultaneous discrimination to result in X (or alternatively the XA configuration) becoming an inhibitor acting directly on the US, and the sequential…
Descriptors: Classical Conditioning, Discrimination Learning, Experiments, Inhibition
Roberts, Roberta D.; Humphreys, Glyn W. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2008
The ability to report the temporal order of 2 tactile stimuli (1 applied to each hand) has been shown to decline when the arms are crossed over compared with when they are uncrossed. However, these effects have only been measured when temporal order was reported by stimulus location. It is unknown whether this spatial manipulation of the body…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Spatial Ability, Human Body, Human Posture
Norrholm, Seth D.; Jovanovic, Tanja; Vervliet, Bram; Myers, Karyn M.; Davis, Michael; Rothbaum, Barbara O.; Duncan, Erica J. – Learning & Memory, 2006
The purpose of this study was to analyze fear extinction and reinstatement in humans using fear-potentiated startle. Participants were fear conditioned using a simple discrimination procedure with colored lights as the conditioned stimuli (CSs) and an airblast to the throat as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Participants were extinguished 24 h…
Descriptors: Fear, Conditioning, Responses, Visual Stimuli
Lowenkron, Barry – Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 2006
Lowenkron and colleagues (Lowenkron, 1984; 1991; 1998; 2006; Lowenkron and Colvin, 1992) describe a model that explains complex behavior using only well-established behavioral principles, concepts and terms. The model, called "joint control," is especially useful for understanding complex and delayed discriminations within a purely behavioral…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Behavior, Models, Discrimination Learning
Bailey, Aileen M. – Psychological Record, 2006
Six male Sprague-Dawley rats were used to examine the long-term retention of an olfactory discrimination learning set. Rats were trained on 30 odor-unique, 5-trial discrimination problems, transferred to an olfactory discrimination reversal task, and then given a 6-week break in training. The rats demonstrated use of a learning set by performing…
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Advance Organizers, Animals, Retention (Psychology)
Swaddle, John P.; Johnson, Charles W. – Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2007
Small deviations from bilateral symmetry (fluctuating asymmetries) are cues to fitness differences in some animals. Therefore, researchers have considered whether animals use these small asymmetries as visual cues to determine appropriate behavioral responses (e.g., mate preferences). However, there have been few systematic studies of animals'…
Descriptors: Animals, Animal Behavior, Cues, Visual Discrimination
Mueller, Michael M.; Palkovic, Christine M.; Maynard, Cynthia S. – Psychology in the Schools, 2007
Errorless learning refers to a variety of discrimination learning techniques that eliminate or minimize responding to incorrect choices. This article describes experimental roots of errorless learning and applied errorless strategies. Specifically, previous research on stimulus fading, stimulus shaping, response prevention, delayed prompting,…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, School Psychologists, Discrimination Learning, Pervasive Developmental Disorders
Peer reviewedPerry, David G.; Garrow, Helen – Developmental Psychology, 1975
This experiment evaluated the contributions of frequency and contingency of reinforcement to the deprivation-satiation phenomenon. The findings indicated that the perceived contingency of reinforcement is a more powerful determinant of its subsequent reinforcement effectiveness than is its frequency. (JMB)
Descriptors: Contingency Management, Discrimination Learning, Learning Theories, Reinforcement
Peer reviewedCasey, M. Beth – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1975
Investigated the effect of correction and noncorrection procedures on the occurrence of the overlearning reversal effect (ORE) in 80 children 4-6 years of age. Results showing the existence of ORE at the preschool level are explained in terms of a response-switching strategy. (GO)
Descriptors: Discrimination Learning, Feedback, Preschool Children, Shift Studies

Direct link
