Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 3 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 12 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 59 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 228 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Haney, Walt | 12 |
| Pipho, Chris | 11 |
| Popham, W. James | 11 |
| Thurlow, Martha | 11 |
| Pullin, Diana | 9 |
| Spicuzza, Richard | 9 |
| Linn, Robert L. | 8 |
| Jaeger, Richard M. | 7 |
| Wise, Arthur E. | 7 |
| Belcher, Marcia | 6 |
| Erickson, Ronald | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 191 |
| Researchers | 95 |
| Teachers | 56 |
| Policymakers | 47 |
| Administrators | 45 |
| Students | 7 |
| Community | 2 |
| Counselors | 2 |
| Parents | 2 |
Location
| Florida | 77 |
| New Jersey | 50 |
| Texas | 39 |
| California | 33 |
| New York | 32 |
| Georgia | 22 |
| Arkansas | 21 |
| Australia | 21 |
| Canada | 21 |
| North Carolina | 19 |
| South Carolina | 19 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedFlippo, Rona F. – Journal of Teacher Education, 1986
The author updates information on teacher competency testing and discusses issues that should be considered by states planning the development and implementation of competency testing programs. Recommendations are made. (MT)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Minimum Competency Testing, Schools of Education, State Standards
Peer reviewedStronge, James H. – Clearing House, 1984
Discusses the arguments for and against minimum competency testing, noting that the same issues are used to support both positions. (FL)
Descriptors: Educational Philosophy, Elementary Secondary Education, Minimum Competency Testing, Test Validity
Peer reviewedGillespie, Ellen B.; Lieberman, Laurence – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1983
Minimum competency testing in Louisiana emphasizes individual needs (as delineated in the indiviualized education program) regardless of special education classification. Nine format/procedural modifications are allowed on the Basic Skills Test, including braille editions and extended time. Test administration and score reporting may also be…
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Disabilities, Educational Policy, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedChandler, Harry N. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1982
The author addresses the concern that many learning handicapped students are being denied diplomas because of minimum competency testing (MCT). The beginnings of the MCT trend are traced, faults with MCT are pointed out, and legal aspects of MCT are considered. (SW)
Descriptors: Educational Trends, Graduation Requirements, High Schools, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedSparks, C. Paul; And Others – Personnel Psychology, 1980
Presents a variety of issues and opinions related to competency testing in industry and business. Calls on professional, public, and legislative groups to act to influence public policy on the use of tests. (HLM)
Descriptors: Business, Employees, Minimum Competency Testing, Psychologists
Peer reviewedPruitt, K. Wayne – Clearing House, 1980
The state laws currently being passed to promote competency-based education and testing are so lacking in detail and so unrealistic in their expectations that they will do little to restore public confidence in education and may even have a disruptive influence. (SJL)
Descriptors: Competency Based Education, Editorials, Elementary Secondary Education, Minimum Competency Testing
Fox, C. Lynn; Weaver, Francine Lavin – Academic Therapy, 1981
The article addresses issues in minimal competency testing for physically handicapped and learning disabled students. Adapting the competency test to the needs of the handicapped students, relating minimal standards to the individualized education program (IEP), and adopting different criteria for graduation are three options considered. (CL)
Descriptors: Graduation Requirements, Individualized Education Programs, Learning Disabilities, Minimum Competency Testing
Peer reviewedDittmer, Allan E. – English Journal, 1980
Expresses the serious problems inherent in minimum competency testing, particularly as it is used in assessing student writing ability. (RL)
Descriptors: Accountability, Minimum Competencies, Minimum Competency Testing, Negative Attitudes
Fensham, Peter J. – Australian Journal of Reading, 1980
The problems inherent to standardized minimum competency testing are discussed. (HTH)
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Elementary Secondary Education, Foreign Countries, Minimum Competency Testing
Peer reviewedShine, William A.; Goldman, Norman – Educational Leadership, 1980
Contends that New Jersey's Minimum Basic Skills (MBS) tests in reading and mathematics waste time and money and should not be used by the state as the criteria to measure school and district performance. Low scores are the result of social conditions schools cannot correct by themselves. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Educational Improvement, Elementary Secondary Education, Mathematics
Peer reviewedBurke, Fred G. – Educational Leadership, 1980
The New Jersey Commissioner of Education replies that the Minimum Basic Skills (MBS) tests are not the sole criterion used to measure school and district performance and that some schools manage to teach well despite their students' low socioeconomic level. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Basic Skills, Educational Improvement, Elementary Secondary Education, Mathematics
Peer reviewedPopham, W. James; Rankin, Stuart C. – Educational Leadership, 1980
The Detroit (Michigan) High School Proficiency Program emphasizes instruction as well as testing. (Author)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Mathematics, Minimum Competency Testing, Reading
Peer reviewedEllet, Chad D.; And Others – Educational Leadership, 1980
All beginning teachers in Georgia receive a three-year nonrenewable certificate. During the term of the certificate they must satisfactorily demonstrate 14 performance competencies in two consecutive assessments. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Beginning Teachers, Elementary Secondary Education, Minimum Competency Testing, Teacher Certification
Peer reviewedMcCarthy, Martha M. – Exceptional Children, 1980
The article addresses 10 questions that should receive thoughtful consideration prior to initiating a competency testing program for handicapped students. (Author)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Graduation Requirements, Legal Problems, Minimum Competency Testing
Peer reviewedAmos, Katherine M. – Exceptional Children, 1980
The discussion of minimum competency testing (MCT) for learning disabled students focuses on advantages and disadvantages, the need for test modifications, and the importance of coordinating the child's individualized education program with MCT considerations. (CL)
Descriptors: Individualized Education Programs, Learning Disabilities, Minimum Competency Testing, Secondary Education


