Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 33 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 96 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 307 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 748 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 638 |
| Administrators | 377 |
| Teachers | 181 |
| Policymakers | 174 |
| Students | 42 |
| Counselors | 33 |
| Researchers | 33 |
| Community | 25 |
| Media Staff | 13 |
| Parents | 11 |
| Support Staff | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 81 |
| California | 72 |
| United States | 62 |
| Australia | 60 |
| New York | 37 |
| Texas | 31 |
| United Kingdom | 31 |
| Florida | 29 |
| Pennsylvania | 24 |
| North Carolina | 23 |
| Illinois | 22 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedAlexander, Sharon J. – Family Coordinator, 1977
Guidelines which reflect the level of the parents' legal involvement is advocated to protect the child's "best interests": when parents choose mediation, a specialist in child custody is appointed to educate and assist in the decision-making process; when parents choose litigation, counsel is appointed to represent the child. (Author)
Descriptors: Children, Civil Rights, Court Litigation, Decision Making
Peer reviewedBowen, William G. – Educational Record, 1977
Opinions are offered regarding: Is it ever proper to consider the race of an applicant, among other attributes? If so, why, and in what ways? Are there significant distinctions to be drawn between the use of quotas and other approaches to the recruitment of minority students? (Author/LBH)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Admission (School), College Applicants, Equal Education
Peer reviewedCarine, Edwin T., Jr. – Community and Junior College Journal, 1977
Reviews college admissions policies as they may be affected by court decisions. Deals specifically with Bakke v. Regents of the University of California, Hupart v. Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, Griggs v. Duke Power Co., the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Washington v. Davis. (RT)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Admission Criteria, College Admission, Community Colleges
Peer reviewedHelms, Lelia B. – Journal of College and University Law, 1987
A survey and analysis of all case law in one state showed a substantial increase in litigation over the last three decades, arising from the growing number of causes of action, especially statutory, available to litigants and increases in categories of plaintiffs willing to sue. Most concern institutions' external constituencies. (MSE)
Descriptors: Case Studies, College Administration, College Faculty, College Students
Peer reviewedSteele, Charles Thomas, Jr. – Journal of College and University Law, 1987
The merits of student arguments challenging the constitutionality of mandatory student fees to finance certain activities or services are examined and balanced against the public university's interest in providing a forum for the expression of diverse and controversial ideas. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Federal Courts
Peer reviewedGoldberg, Steven S. – Planning and Changing, 1986
Research suggests that federal legislation to resolve educational issues may be unrealistic and unworkable in practice. Parents and school officials accustomed to controlling educational decision making do not appreciate policy imposition from a distant bureaucracy; responses to policy may produce unequal or unfair outcomes when implemented at the…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Instructional Improvement
Peer reviewedDutile, Ferdinand N. – Journal of College and University Law, 1988
A case in which a Georgetown University gay student group sued the institution for its refusal to allow use of university facilities is discussed, focusing on the conflicts between freedom of religious exercise and statutory civil rights and between libertarian and egalitarian values. (MSE)
Descriptors: Church Related Colleges, Civil Liberties, College Buildings, Court Litigation
Peer reviewedKeller, Elisabeth A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1988
The right to form adult consensual intimate relationships is a fundamental personal freedom. A strong and effective university policy against sexual harassment and the recognition of faculty and students' right to privacy will, within the parameters of constitutional guarantees, serve both the university's and the individual's interest.…
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Ethics, Higher Education
Peer reviewedCunningham, Maureen P.; And Others – Journal of College and University Law, 1988
A case in which California's constitutional right to privacy is used to protect confidential peer review files is analyzed, and the case's significance and possible ramifications for discovery requests of peer review files are discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Faculty, Confidentiality, Constitutional Law
Peer reviewedCurry, Susan J.; And Others – Journal of College and University Law, 1988
The significance of the court decision in Pime vs. Loyola University of Chicago, concerning the university's right to reserve tenure track positions for Jesuit faculty, is in the expansion of the defense relating to bona fide occupational qualifications. It opens other schools to similar litigation. (MSE)
Descriptors: Church Related Colleges, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Employment Practices
Peer reviewedDelon, Floyd G. – West's Education Law Reporter, 1988
The most likely legal challenge to assessment centers is racial discrimination. Although validation studies have shown the assessment center to be job related and no equally effective alternative to be available, futher validation will be needed with each new application of assessment centers in certification and employment decisions. (MLF)
Descriptors: Administrator Qualifications, Administrators, Assessment Centers (Personnel), Court Litigation
Splitt, David A. – Executive Educator, 1987
Discusses "Mozert v. Hawkins County Public Schools" (Tennessee), a case involving a controversial reading textbook offending fundamentalist parents of six middle school children. The Court of Appeals reversed a district court ruling, holding that uniform use of the Holt textbook was not essential to the state's goals to teach reading.…
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Controversial Issues (Course Content), Court Litigation, Junior High Schools
Sendor, Benjamin – American School Board Journal, 1987
Discusses the debate over proper balance between a school board's authority to prescribe a uniform curriculum and parent's First Amendment right to free exercise of religion, citing a recent Tennessee case which determined that uniform use of objectionable texts is not crucial for a sound education. (WTH)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Course Selection (Students), Court Litigation, Curriculum Problems
Humphrey, Glenn W. – White Cloud Journal of American Indian Mental Health, 1985
Presents a case illustrating the legal and jurisdictional problems confronting Indian tribes when they attempt to deal with mentally disordered and dangerous Indian persons. Discusses lack of facilities on Indian reservations and the difficulties involved in tribal courts using state facilities. Outlines an extralegal solution that allows one…
Descriptors: American Indian Reservations, American Indians, Correctional Institutions, Court Litigation
Peer reviewedAchter, Chuck; Pelowski, Dan – NASSP Bulletin, 1986
Chaska High School (Minnesota) established a firm district policy to prevent unauthorized, illegal duplication of computer software by teachers and students. The policy's success depends on an ethics re-education program for users, increased funding for software, and a preview library for teachers. (MLH)
Descriptors: Board of Education Policy, Compliance (Legal), Computer Software, Copyrights


