Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 111 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 636 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1513 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3002 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 585 |
| Teachers | 339 |
| Administrators | 257 |
| Policymakers | 170 |
| Media Staff | 70 |
| Researchers | 68 |
| Students | 56 |
| Community | 14 |
| Parents | 7 |
| Counselors | 4 |
Location
| United States | 204 |
| Canada | 173 |
| United Kingdom | 137 |
| Australia | 128 |
| China | 109 |
| California | 93 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 81 |
| Turkey | 77 |
| South Africa | 75 |
| Germany | 70 |
| Sweden | 61 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedMarvin, Carolyn – Journal of Communication, 1980
Discusses the development of electronic technology in the newspaper industry, including the use of computers in print production, and satellites for teletext and videotext transmission. Highlights the impact of these innovations on readers' habits and in terms of government regulation and freedom of the press. (JMF)
Descriptors: Communications, Computers, Freedom of Speech, Futures (of Society)
Peer reviewedFuller, Lawrence B. – English Journal, 1979
Reviews court decisions that have a bearing on students' rights to freedom of expression in school publications. (DD)
Descriptors: Censorship, Court Litigation, Faculty Advisers, Freedom of Speech
Swan, John C. – Library Journal, 1981
Contends that librarians are educators, not passive instruments of information processing. As such, the better prepared and more open the educating librarian is, the greater the contribution to intellectual freedom. Minimum employment qualifications must consider and include broad skills beyond the basic library competencies. Four references are…
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, Censorship, Civil Liberties, Employment Qualifications
Peer reviewedHart, Jack R. – Journalism Quarterly, 1979
Discusses issues involved in the 1977 United States Court of Appeals decision in "Edwards vs National Audubon Society," which provided a First Amendment shield for the news report of one public figure's attack on the character or performance of another. (GT)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Freedom of Speech
Peer reviewedMcLean, Deckle – Journalism Quarterly, 1979
An analysis of the opinions of Justice Byron R. White in numerous Supreme Court decisions indicates that, rather than being a foe of the First Amendment as is sometimes charged, White occupies a middle ground on First Amendment media issues. (GT)
Descriptors: Censorship, Civil Liberties, Constitutional Law, Freedom of Speech
Labor Law Reform: The Regulation of Free Speech and Equal Access in NLRB Representational Elections.
Peer reviewedUniversity of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1979
After examining the existing legal standards governing free speech and equal access in representation elections, the author analyzes various reform possibilities and suggests a unified approach for legislative action. Available from the University of Pennsylvania Law School, 3400 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104; $3.00 sc.…
Descriptors: Administrative Agencies, Court Litigation, Elections, Federal Legislation
Nolte, M. Chester – NOLPE School Law Journal, 1980
Present court cases on censorship tend to favor states' rights over national constitutional standards, adult rights over children's rights, and the collectivistic viewpoint over the individual's right to receive information. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Boards of Education, Censorship, Court Litigation, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedFindlay, James, Jr.; Bennett, Ruth R. – Academe: Bulletin of the AAUP, 1981
An AAUP investigating committee report is presented concerning the dismissal of Professor Erwin D. Harris from his position as a tenured member of the faculty at Bridgewater State College. (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Faculty, Dismissal (Personnel), Due Process
Broussard, E. Joseph; Blackmon, C. Robert – Quill and Scroll, 1980
Polled high school principals on their handling of situations involving student press rights. Compared the results to a similar survey and to actual court decisions. (RL)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Censorship, Court Litigation, Freedom of Speech
Peer reviewedPark, J. Charles – Educational Leadership, 1980
Lists the leaders and the organizations that have formed the political coalition that calls itself the "New Right." Summarizes their attacks on "humanism" and recommends that educators clarify terms and inform the public of the purposes of public education in a democracy. (Author/MLF)
Descriptors: Censorship, Democratic Values, Elementary Secondary Education, Freedom of Speech
Boyer, John H. – Scholastic Editor, 1980
Discusses a court decision to suppress an edition of a high school newspaper. Traces the precedents on which the court based its decision and suggests that the decision is in contrast to most other recent court decisions involving school newspapers. (TJ)
Descriptors: Censorship, Court Litigation, Freedom of Speech, School Newspapers
Peer reviewedDiamond, Priscilla – Journal of Law and Education, 1979
Difficulties in applying the reasonable forecast standard to physical disruption dims in comparison to the problem of forecasting psychological disturbance. The "Trachtman" case represents a deep bow to the wisdom of school officials' conclusions that harm would result from giving students a questionnaire on sexuality. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Court Litigation, Freedom of Speech, Questionnaires
Lader, Kurt – C.S.P.A.A. Bulletin, 1979
Explains how one school newspaper handled the publication of a controversial story on teenage sex. Includes the student publications guidelines of the school district. (TJ)
Descriptors: Freedom of Speech, Scholastic Journalism, School Newspapers, Secondary Education
Peer reviewedMcCarthy, William Osler – Journalism Quarterly, 1979
A review of recent state court decisions in libel cases suggests that the law of defamation is in as much disarray as it was when the Supreme Court recognized the problem and tried to remedy it with its 1974 decision in "Gertz v. Robert Welch Inc." (GT)
Descriptors: Civil Liberties, Court Litigation, Freedom of Speech, Journalism
English, Carolene – Photolith, 1976
Descriptors: Censorship, Court Litigation, Freedom of Speech, Legal Problems


