Extensive observational data were gathered in high school classrooms for handicapped and nonhandicapped students to establish social norms for comparision purposes, and help determine integrated placement. Significant difference in two behaviors (reading and listening/participation) were noted between the handicapped and nonhandicapped students.…

The authors, asserting that proponents of integration have often built their arguments on mistaken assumptions, proceed to discuss these assumptions with regard to emotionally disturbed/behavior disordered children and present arguments for segregation and an appropriate procedure for reintegration. (Author)

The incidence figures of handicapped children in a sample of school districts were calculated. During the 1977-78, 1978-79, and 1979-80 school years, four to five percent of the students were referred or evaluated; three percent were placed in special education programs, with wide variation in the data supplied by individual school districts.…

Examples of pull-out programs for gifted children (in which students are removed to a special setting for a portion of the school week) are reviewed and reactions of teachers and administrators are cited regarding the model's strengths and weaknesses. Views on the model of six authorities are presented. (CL)

The article traces the history of mass segregation of handicapped students in U.S. public schools, notes the advent of the concepts of mainstreaming and least restrictive environment, and analyzes such ramifications of mainstreaming as increased numbers of handicapped students in college and re-emergence of "tracking" or ability grouping. (CL)

The impetus and logic for maintenance or reintegration of marginally inadequate students in regular class programs is discussed. (Author)

Discussed are undesirable proliferation of special education classes and some possible alternatives which could increase the number of children able to remain in regular classes. (KW)

The author refutes six allegations concerning both methods of identifying the retarded and programs for educating them. (Author/CB)

This paper describes a multidiscipline center organized within an urban school system to deal with the educational difficulties of disruptive children. Data relevant to the evaluation of the success of the center's first 18 months of operation are given. (Author)

Suggests techniques for planning and administering gifted programs, identifying gifted students, and gaining program acceptance. (JM)

College for Kids is a Pennsylvania program which consists of a consortium of six colleges which offer special six-week classes for gifted children from 5 to 15 years of age. (DB)

Twenty-one steps to aid in curriculum development are outlined, including reading or rereading assessment reports developed by teachers or other professionals; knowing the home, school, and community music resources; and determining and teaching prerequisite skills. Journal availability: National Association for Music Therapy, Inc., P O. Box 610,…