Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 225 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1358 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 2816 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 4806 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 182 |
| Researchers | 146 |
| Teachers | 122 |
| Policymakers | 40 |
| Administrators | 36 |
| Students | 15 |
| Counselors | 9 |
| Parents | 4 |
| Media Staff | 3 |
| Support Staff | 3 |
Location
| Australia | 169 |
| United Kingdom | 153 |
| Turkey | 126 |
| China | 117 |
| Germany | 108 |
| Canada | 106 |
| Spain | 94 |
| Taiwan | 89 |
| Netherlands | 73 |
| Iran | 71 |
| United States | 68 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 4 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 4 |
| Does not meet standards | 5 |
Peer reviewedSchaefer, Edward; Marschall, Laurence A. – American Journal of Physics, 1980
Describes an easy-to-use set of computer programs for the generation of multiple-choice and essay examinations in an introductory astronomy course. Program enables the user to establish files of test questions and to rapidly assemble printed copies of examinations suitable for photocopying. (Author/GS)
Descriptors: Astronomy, College Science, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Programs
Proctor, Andrew J. – Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 1980
As computers become increasingly available to public schools, physical education teachers and coaches will have access to the many services and conveniences the computer offers. Physical education majors should be kept current with technology that affects their professional development. (CJ)
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Course Content, Higher Education, Measurement Equipment
Peer reviewedRoos, Linda L.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1996
This article describes Minnesota Computerized Adaptive Testing Language program code for using the MicroCAT 3.5 testing software to administer several types of self-adapted tests. Code is provided for: a basic self-adapted test; a self-adapted version of an adaptive mastery test; and a restricted self-adapted test. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Mastery Tests, Programming
Peer reviewedGallagher, Ann; Bennett, Randy Elliot; Cahalan, Cara; Rock, Donald A. – Educational Assessment, 2002
Evaluated whether variance due to computer-based presentation was associated with performance on a new constructed-response type, Mathematical Expression, that requires students to enter expressions. No statistical evidence of construct-irrelevant variance was detected for the 178 undergraduate and graduate students, but some examinees reported…
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Constructed Response, Educational Technology
Peer reviewedStocking, Martha L. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1996
An alternative method for scoring adaptive tests, based on number-correct scores, is explored and compared with a method that relies more directly on item response theory. Using the number-correct score with necessary adjustment for intentional differences in adaptive test difficulty is a statistically viable scoring method. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Difficulty Level, Item Response Theory
Peer reviewedPotenza, Maria T.; Stocking, Martha L. – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1997
Common strategies for dealing with flawed items in conventional testing, grounded in principles of fairness to examinees, are re-examined in the context of adaptive testing. The additional strategy of retesting from a pool cleansed of flawed items is found, through a Monte Carlo study, to bring about no practical improvement. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Item Banks, Monte Carlo Methods
Peer reviewedLevinson, Edward M.; Zeman, Heather L.; Ohler, Denise L. – Career Development Quarterly, 2002
Assesses the reliability and validity of the Web-based version of the Career Key. Participants completed the Web-based version of the Career Key and the Self-Directed Search-Form R and completed a second Career Key administration 2 weeks later. Test-retest reliability ranged between .75 and .84. With the exception of the conventional scale, all…
Descriptors: Career Counseling, Computer Assisted Testing, Concurrent Validity, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedFolk, Valerie Greaud; Green, Bert F. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
Some effects of using unidimensional item response theory (IRT) were examined when the assumption of unidimensionality was violated. Adaptive and nonadaptive tests were used. It appears that use of a unidimensional model can bias parameter estimation, adaptive item selection, and ability estimation for the two types of testing. (TJH)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation
Peer reviewedDodd, Barbara G.; And Others – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1989
General guidelines are developed to assist practitioners in devising operational computerized adaptive testing systems based on the graded response model. The effects of the following major variables were examined: item pool size; stepsize used along the trait continuum until maximum likelihood estimation could be calculated; and stopping rule…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation, Item Banks
Peer reviewedFleishman, Edwin A. – Personnel Psychology, 1988
Reviews current research developments in several areas of personnel selection methodology which represent attempts to develop alternatives to traditional paper-and-pencil methods of test development. Areas examined include computer-interactive tests in employment situation, new uses for life history information, physical tests for physically…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Personnel Selection
Peer reviewedGajar, Anna H. – Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1989
A computer analysis of the compositions written by university students with (N=30) and without (N-60) learning disabilities (LD) found LD students were not as fluent in word production and in the number of different words used but did produce longer sentences and T-units than nondisabled peers. (DB)
Descriptors: College Students, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Learning Disabilities
Peer reviewedKingsbury, G. Gage; Zara, Anthony R. – Applied Measurement in Education, 1991
This simulation investigated two procedures that reduce differences between paper-and-pencil testing and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) by making CAT content sensitive. Results indicate that the price in terms of additional test items of using constrained CAT for content balancing is much smaller than that of using testlets. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Simulation
Peer reviewedRead, Charles; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1992
Performance characteristics are reviewed for seven computerized systems marketed for acoustic speech analysis: CSpeech, CSRE, ILS-PC, Kay Elemetrics model 550 Sona-Graph, MacSpeech Lab II, MSL, and Signalyze. Characteristics reviewed include system components, basic capabilities, documentation, user interface, data formats and journaling, and…
Descriptors: Acoustic Phonetics, Computer Assisted Testing, Equipment Evaluation, Microcomputers
Peer reviewedKapes, Jerome T.; Vansickle, Timothy R. – Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 1992
Examined equivalence of mode of administration of the Career Decision-Making System, comparing paper-and-pencil version and computer-based version. Findings from 61 undergraduate students indicated that the computer-based version was significantly more reliable than paper-and-pencil version and was generally equivalent in other respects.…
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Higher Education, Test Format
Peer reviewedYoungjohn, James R.; And Others – Psychological Assessment, 1992
To elucidate differences between normal age-associated memory impairment (AAMI) and mild Alzheimer's disease (AD), batteries of traditional memory tasks and computer-simulated everyday memory tests were administered to 56 matched AAMI-AD pairs. Results demonstrate the feasibility of discriminating mild AD through these tests. (SLD)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Aging (Individuals), Alzheimers Disease, Computer Assisted Testing


