Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 9 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 88 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 243 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 550 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 53 |
| Practitioners | 38 |
| Teachers | 16 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
Location
| Australia | 22 |
| Canada | 18 |
| China | 14 |
| United Kingdom | 14 |
| Netherlands | 11 |
| France | 9 |
| Germany | 9 |
| Finland | 8 |
| New York | 7 |
| Greece | 6 |
| Hong Kong | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 6 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
| Civil Rights Act 1964 Title IV | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| National Defense Education Act | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
Problems of Validity in Connection with the Concept of Auditory Discrimination between Speech Sounds
Peer reviewedSkjelfjord, Vebjorn J. – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1975
An attempt was made to show that the connection repeatedly found between reading scores and scores on tests for auditive discrimination between speech sounds in children with no articulatory defects, results from the fact that the tests really measure a special skill in phonemic segmentation, a skill which is promoted by the instruction in…
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Auditory Tests
Peer reviewedNober, Linda W. – Reading Teacher, 1973
Supports auditory research which clarly demonstrates that auditory perception is adversely affected by noise. (Author/RB)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Classroom Environment, Classroom Research
Peer reviewedSergeant, Desmond – Journal of Research in Music Education, 1973
Purpose of this article is to report an investigation of the usefulness of hearing tests under various conditions, and of the validity of such tests for the study of musicality. (Author)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Tests, Music, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedHair, Harriet I. – Journal of Research in Music Education, 1973
Purpose of this study was to determine if children in the first grade could discriminate whether two paired chords were the same or different, could learn to associate a tone with a chord in four brief training sessions, and could improve more in harmonic discrimination when performing chords in the training sessions than when merely listening to…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Grade 1, Music, Responses
Gengel, Roy W. – J Speech Hearing Res, 1969
Part of author's Ph.D. dissertation, Washington University, 1968. (JJ)
Descriptors: Audiometric Tests, Auditory Discrimination, Electronic Equipment, Exceptional Child Research
Treon, Martin A. – Lang Speech, 1970
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Auditory Discrimination, Consonants, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewedCrowder, Robert G. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1982
The auditory memory loss of same-different vowel discrimination experiments with a silent delay appear to be asymptotic at about three seconds, whether measured by correct discrimination or by contextual influences of the first vowel on identification of the second. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Context Clues, Higher Education
Peer reviewedFuller, Peter W.; And Others – Child Development, 1981
Determines whether an averaged evoked potential technique using a random-v-repetitive presentation mode could be used to study infant auditory discrimination. Results showed a main effect of presentation mode with shorter latency for random v repetitive. The shortest onset latency was for random stimulus at the fast rate. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Attention Span, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Auditory Tests
Peer reviewedDavis, Sylvia M.; McCroskey, Robert L. – Child Development, 1980
Focuses on auditory fusion (defined in terms of a listerner's ability to distinguish paired acoustic events from single acoustic events) in 3- to 12-year-old children. The subjects listened to 270 pairs of tones controlled for frequency, intensity, and duration. (CM)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Tests, Children
Peer reviewedEllis, Mark Carlton – Journal of Research in Music Education, 1989
Measures the ability of three groups of musicians to detect tempo change while reading and performing music. Compares this ability with that of the same musicians to detect tempo change while listening only. Found that for all groups the ability to detect tempo changes was inhibited by the playing task, although to different degrees for each…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Educational Research, Music Education, Music Reading
Peer reviewedElfenbein, Jill L.; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1993
This examination of the auditory perceptual abilities of 40 children, ages 4-10, and 10 adults found significant differences between the performances of the 4- to 8-year olds and of the adults. Acquisition of adultlike duration discrimination performance was demonstrated between the ages of 8 and 10 years. (Author/JDD)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception
Peer reviewedBijeljac-Babic, Ranka; And Others – Developmental Psychology, 1993
Three experiments tested whether four-day-old infants can discriminate multisyllabic utterances on the basis of the number of syllables or the number of phonemes. The results provided no evidence that infants were sensitive to a change in number of phonemic constituents. (MDM)
Descriptors: Audiolingual Skills, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedGomes, Hilary; And Others – Developmental Psychology, 1999
Investigated developmental change in duration of auditory sensory memory for tonal frequency by measuring mismatch negativity, an electrophysiological component of the auditory event-related potential that is relatively insensitive to attention and does not require a behavioral response. Findings among children and adults suggest that there are…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Attention, Auditory Discrimination
Hollich, George; Newman, Rochelle S.; Jusczyk, Peter W. – Child Development, 2005
In 4 studies, 7.5-month-olds used synchronized visua-lauditory correlations to separate a target speech stream when a distractor passage was presented at equal loudness. Infants succeeded in a segmentation task (using the head-turn preference procedure with video familiarization) when a video of the talker's face was synchronized with the target…
Descriptors: Infants, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Visual Stimuli
Griffiths, Yvonne M.; Hill, Nicholas I.; Bailey, Peter J.; Snowling, Margaret J. – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2003
The ability of 20 adult dyslexic readers to extract frequency information from successive tone pairs was compared with that of IQ-matched controls using temporal order discrimination and auditory backward recognition masking (ABRM) tasks. In both paradigms, the interstimulus interval (ISI) between tones in a pair was either short (20 ms) or long…
Descriptors: Adults, Dyslexia, Auditory Discrimination, Comparative Analysis

Direct link
