Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 2 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 5 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 32 |
Descriptor
Source
| Linguistics | 57 |
| Language | 36 |
| Language Sciences | 36 |
| Journal of Linguistics | 31 |
| Linguistik und Didaktik | 24 |
| Langages | 22 |
| Langue Francaise | 19 |
| International Review of… | 15 |
| Glossa | 13 |
| Hispania | 12 |
| Modern Language Journal | 11 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 9 |
| Secondary Education | 7 |
| Higher Education | 5 |
| Middle Schools | 4 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
| Grade 4 | 3 |
| Grade 5 | 3 |
| Grade 7 | 3 |
| Grade 8 | 3 |
| Junior High Schools | 3 |
| Adult Education | 2 |
| More ▼ | |
Audience
| Practitioners | 11 |
| Teachers | 7 |
Location
| Oregon | 10 |
| District of Columbia | 3 |
| West Germany | 3 |
| Hawaii (Honolulu) | 2 |
| Japan | 2 |
| Nepal | 2 |
| New York | 2 |
| Sweden | 2 |
| Turkey | 2 |
| California | 1 |
| Canada (Montreal) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| National Defense Education… | 3 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
| Michigan Test of English… | 2 |
| Florida Comprehensive… | 1 |
| Illinois Test of… | 1 |
| National Assessment of… | 1 |
| School and College Ability… | 1 |
| Sequential Tests of… | 1 |
| Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Arndt, Horst; Careless, Brian J. – Etudes de Linguistique Appliquee, 1978
Surveys current developments in linguistics and other disciplines which influence language teaching methodology. A brief bibliography is appended. (AM)
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Educational Trends, Language Instruction, Linguistics
Peer reviewedMonnerie, Annie – Langue Francaise, 1979
Examines the positive and negative features of traditional, transformational, and notional grammar as they relate to the teaching of French as a foreign language. (AM)
Descriptors: French, Grammar, Language Instruction, Linguistic Theory
Kastovsky, Dieter – Linguistik und Didaktik, 1978
Reviews some aspects of word formation in foreign language teaching that are receiving attention in current discussions. (IFS/WGA)
Descriptors: English (Second Language), Language Instruction, Morphology (Languages), Second Language Learning
Peer reviewedDessaux, Anne-Marie – Langue Francaise, 1976
Describes the use of some determiners in French and shows how their syntactic and semantic roles are interrelated. (Text is in French.) (TL)
Descriptors: Adverbs, Determiners (Languages), Form Classes (Languages), French
Peer reviewedSuleiman, Saleh M. – Language Sciences, 1989
Investigates the pragmatic functions of topicalizing subject (S) and object (O) in Standard Arabic and attempts to find a functional explanation for the occasional preposing/topicalization of S and/or O over the verb (V) to yield a construction in the form of SVO order or any other order sanctioned by the rules of Arabic grammar. (22 references)…
Descriptors: Arabic, Discourse Analysis, Grammar, Language Research
Kim, Hee-Seob – 1988
The structure of complementation in complex predicates in Korean has attracted configurational analysis. Using a lexical functional grammar (LFG) framework, this paper examines the structure of complementation in complex predicates. The term "predicate" in this context is used to describe both verbs and adjectives that are assumed to…
Descriptors: Adjectives, Foreign Countries, Korean, Lexicology
Peer reviewedArutjunova, N. D. – Linguistics, 1975
Treats the general linguistic aspect of Fillmore's theories. (RM)
Descriptors: Case (Grammar), Deep Structure, Generative Grammar, Language Universals
Peer reviewedBouma, Lowell – Lingua, 1975
The modal auxiliary system in both German and English is seen as a grammatical category (relative assertion) which stands in specific opposition to the absence of a modal in a sentence (factual assertion). (Available from North-Holland Publishing Co., P. O. Box 211, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.) (CHK)
Descriptors: Contrastive Linguistics, Descriptive Linguistics, English, Form Classes (Languages)
Cruset, Jose – Yelmo, 1975
Discusses the difficulty of describing the linguistic approach to the study of language to a non-linguist. Points out certain differences between traditional grammar, structural analysis and contemporary language analysis and gives a short description of the notion of generative grammar. (Text is in Spanish.) (TL)
Descriptors: Generative Grammar, Grammar, Linguistic Theory, Sentence Structure
Peer reviewedBabby, Leonard H. – Slavic and East European Journal, 1975
The fact that impersonal verbs in Russian do not form active participles or gerunds is discussed and explained. (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Linguistic Theory, Morphology (Languages), Russian
Peer reviewedPolanski, Kazimierz – Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 1972
An argument is made for a theory of deep structure which does not neglect surface structure analysis. See FL 508 197 for availability. (RM)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, English, Language Universals, Linguistic Theory
Bates, Madeleine; And Others – 1981
The advantages of a knowledge-based computer program that creates exercises for language instruction rather than presenting pre-stored materials are discussed, and one such system, ILIAD, is described. Designed to address a broad range of language learning needs, this system can be used by people learning English as a second language and by…
Descriptors: Computational Linguistics, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Programs, English Instruction
White, Ronald V. – IRAL, 1974
Descriptors: Communication Skills, Competency Based Education, Language Instruction, Linguistic Competence
Peer reviewedMakkai, Adam – Language Sciences, 1974
The verb "take" as presented by Langendoen and McCawley is examined in order to prove to the reader that transformational generative grammar suffers from a disregard of empirical fact. (Author/LG)
Descriptors: Deep Structure, Idioms, Language Patterns, Language Research
Peer reviewedEhri, Linnea C.; Ammon, Paul R. – Child Development, 1974
Children, aged 4-8 were given 2-term relational problems to test the hypothesis that only older children can process sentences as propositions and realize their logical implications. Results indicated even the youngest children could perform the task. (ST)
Descriptors: Abstract Reasoning, Cognitive Development, Comprehension, Elementary School Students


