Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 9 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 88 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 243 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 550 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 53 |
| Practitioners | 38 |
| Teachers | 16 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
Location
| Australia | 22 |
| Canada | 18 |
| China | 14 |
| United Kingdom | 14 |
| Netherlands | 11 |
| France | 9 |
| Germany | 9 |
| Finland | 8 |
| New York | 7 |
| Greece | 6 |
| Hong Kong | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 6 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
| Civil Rights Act 1964 Title IV | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| National Defense Education Act | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
Queen, Daniel – Audiovisual Instruction, 1974
A discussion of the standards issued by the American National Standards Institute for audiovisual equipment used primarily for speech. (HB)
Descriptors: Acoustics, Audio Equipment, Audiovisual Aids, Auditory Discrimination
Shaughnessy, John J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973
Study examined the effects of the variables of list length and pronunciation instructions on performance in the verbal discrimination and two category classification tasks and found that the effects of these variables on the two tasks were quite comparable. (Author)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Discriminant Analysis, Experimental Psychology, Learning Modalities
Peer reviewedHardy, Madeline; And Others – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1973
Results of this study suggest that, for primary level children, the natural'' perceptual unit of spoken language is the syllable, not the phoneme. (Authors)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Beginning Reading, Child Language
Lewis, William J. – Elementary English, 1972
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Child Language, Kindergarten, Language Acquisition
Peer reviewedLowder, Jerry E. – Journal of Research in Music Education, 1973
Purpose of this study was to provide an analysis of errors performed on a sight-reading test administered to four college freshman piano classes at the end of their first semester of instruction. (Author)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, College Freshmen, Error Patterns, Evaluation
Suen, Ching Yee; Beddoes, Michael P. – Perception and Psychophysics, 1972
Research for this report supported by grants from the National Research Council and the Medical Research Council of Canada. (RS)
Descriptors: Acoustic Phonetics, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Diagrams
Peer reviewedJeffries, Thomas B. – Journal of Research in Music Education, 1972
Objective of this study was to determine subjects' reliability in rating randomly played ascending and descending melodic intervals within the octave on the basis of their familiarity with each type of interval and the frequency of their having experienced each type of interval in music. (Author/CB)
Descriptors: Associative Learning, Auditory Discrimination, Aural Learning, College Students
Abbs, James H.; Smith, Karl U. – J Speech Hearing Res, 1970
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Electronic Equipment
Peer reviewedTrehub, Sandra E.; Rabinovitch, M. Sam – Developmental Psychology, 1972
Three investigations are reported which indicate that infants between 4 and 17 weeks of age are able to detect some differences in sounds upon which phonemic contrasts are based. (Authors)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Aural Learning, Child Development
Juurmaa, Jyrki – New Outlook Blind, 1970
The first part of the article appeared in the March issue of New Outlook for the Blind. (JM)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Exceptional Child Research, Mobility Aids, Travel Training
Peer reviewedJames, Angela L.; Barry, Robert J. – Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1983
Using magnitude of dominant ear advantage as an indicator of relative cerebral dominance, unwarned simple reaction time (RT) to monaural presentation of tones was investigated in matched groups of autistic, retarded, and normal children. Autistic children showed significant developmental delay in both RT and the establishment of cerebral…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Autism, Cerebral Dominance, Developmental Disabilities
Peer reviewedMenary, Susan; And Others – Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1982
Eleven four-year-old children were tested for discrimination of the following word pairs: rope/robe, seat/seed, pick/pig, ice/eyes, and mouse/mouth. All word pairs were found to be discriminable, but performance on seat/seed and mouse/mouth was inferior to that of the other word pairs. (Author)
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Auditory Discrimination, Language Acquisition, Preschool Education
Peer reviewedMathes, Sharon; Flatten, Kay – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1982
To assess the performance characteristics of synthetic and leather basketballs, individuals were asked to discriminate perceptually between the leather and synthetic basketballs under four treatment conditions. Rebound characteristics on five playing surfaces were measured. Leather basketballs rebounded significantly higher; no significant…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Basketball, Evaluation, Kinesthetic Perception
Peer reviewedMacKain, Kristine S. – Journal of Child Language, 1982
Argues that knowing how infants process speech is a prerequisite to any definition of linguistic experience and therefore, the discrimination paradigm does not provide a test for the effect of experience on infants' speech discrimination. Outlines conditions to be met in order to conclude an effect of experience. (EKN)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Child Language, Infants
Peer reviewedCherry, Rochelle Silberzweig – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1981
Fifty-three children (ages 5-9) were individually tested on their ability to select pictures of monosyllabic words presented diotically via headphones. Tasks were presented in quiet and under three noise (distractor) conditions: white noise, speech backwards, and speech forward. Age and type of distractor significantly influenced test scores.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Discrimination Learning


