Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 117 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 607 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1401 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2570 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| Follman, John | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 436 |
| Administrators | 99 |
| Researchers | 50 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 107 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 70 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedNorcini, John; And Others – Applied Measurement in Education, 1994
Whether anchor item sets varying in difficulty and discrimination affect precision of cutting score equivalents generated through judge rescaling as much as equivalents from score equating was studied with 4 groups of experts and 250 and 1,000 examinees. Results indicate the robustness of judge rescaling and its superiority over equating. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Decision Making, Difficulty Level, Equated Scores
Peer reviewedUchmanowicz, Pauline – College English, 1995
Provides discussion and critical analysis of the "dog days" of part-time writing instructors in today's academic world. Compares student writing and teacher evaluation of that writing at vastly different colleges at which the same instructor taught. Considers how teacher attitudes are swayed by institutional setting. (HB)
Descriptors: Case Studies, English Instruction, Freshman Composition, Grading
Peer reviewedDorsey, J. Kevin; Colliver, Jerry A. – Academic Medicine, 1995
Because of concern about potential gender and racial bias in medical test grading, score patterns were examined for male and female and for white and African American medical freshmen (n=476) before and after implementation of an anonymous test grading policy. Results indicate no widespread grading bias before the policy change. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Black Students, Females, Grading, Higher Education
Peer reviewedCarey, Anna Kirwan – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1995
Describes how one English teacher revised course goals and journal writing assignments to promote better thinking and writing in a college literature course. Concentrates on the way "Beowulf" was taught and the kinds of writing about it that were produced by students as a result. (HB)
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, English Curriculum, English Instruction, Grading
Peer reviewedVargas, Elena Maldonado; Alvarez, Hector Joel – Science Scope, 1992
Presents a concept-map scheme that provides a consistent syntax and grading system for using concept maps as assessment tools. The grading scheme awards points for demonstrating hierarchies, relationships, branching, and cross links. Examples showing the use of the key are presented. (PR)
Descriptors: Concept Mapping, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedTriplett, John W.; And Others – American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 1992
This paper describes the development and evolution of a modular pharmacy practice course that uses practitioners as role-model instructors in prepared and impromptu scenarios. The course reviews the top 200 drug products while introducing students to both community and institutional practice settings. Appendices include a summary of the…
Descriptors: Course Descriptions, Curriculum Development, Drug Education, Grading
Peer reviewedEsty, Warren W.; Teppo, Anne R. – Mathematics Teacher, 1992
Examines the consequences of assigning student grades using test-score averaging on course materials, tests, and learning. Proposes an alternative method of grading based on progressive improvement by the student that emphasizes the learning of concepts. (MDH)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Evaluation Methods, Grading, Instructional Innovation
Weinberger, Harold; Schepard, Andrew – Wests's Education Law Quarterly, 1993
Reviews a case that vindicates the principle of judicial noninterference in academic evaluation of students. Describes the strategy of the lawyers who represented the academic institution. Discusses alternative approaches for serving the competing values at stake in grading decisions. (52 footnotes) (MLF)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Environment, Court Litigation, Grading
Peer reviewedPhillips, David – Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1991
Describes assessment in the German school system as regular, systematic, and officially controlled through legislation. Emphasizes that even strict grading levels combine criterion and norm referencing because teacher determination must include a subjective element. Concludes that other systems may best learn negative lessons from the German…
Descriptors: Educational Testing, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewedJuarez, Tina – NASSP Bulletin, 1992
The principal is uniquely positioned to help teachers plan for instruction, especially in the areas of student evaluation and grading. One approach is conducting inservice programs to promote an evaluation-based model of teacher planning incorporating both the objectives- and activities-based planning models. Teachers can then match assessment…
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Elementary Secondary Education, Grading, Inservice Education
Peer reviewedArnstine, Donald; McDowell, Judith A. – Teacher Education Quarterly, 1993
Teachers' merit pay and students' grades depend on valid evaluations and are functions of many factors besides the quality of work being evaluated. If individual merit cannot be validly determined as a basis for rewards, then there is not a fair system of merit rewards for teachers and students. (SM)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Grades (Scholastic), Grading
Peer reviewedRogers, W. Todd – Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1991
Research findings suggest that teachers are not competent in student assessment and that teacher education programs do not provide adequate training in assessment techniques. A survey of 33 Canadian universities found that most prospective teachers did not complete a measurement and evaluation course. Contains 44 references. (SV)
Descriptors: Education Courses, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Problems, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedBeatty, Michael J.; Zahn, Christopher J. – Communication Education, 1990
Investigates the empirical relationships between student ratings of teachers and student-reported performance. Finds that students discriminate between sociability and qualification-related aspects of teacher performance and that student ratings were not the product of "easy" grading practices. (SR)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Educational Research, Grading, Higher Education
Grading Scales of Virginia High Schools and Admissions Action at Virginia Tech: A Research Analysis.
Peer reviewedCarson, E. W.; And Others – College and University, 1990
Descriptive statistics of grading scales used in 371 Virginia high schools are discussed in light of the admissions decisions at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. An analysis of the effect of grading scales on admissions decisions is presented. Nontraditional analysis is recommended as an alternative for interpreting the complex…
Descriptors: Admission Criteria, College Admission, Decision Making, Grades (Scholastic)
Peer reviewedOlbert, Sharon; Ring, Kathryn – Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 1993
Describes a writing assignment in which students from two different first-year composition classes evaluated and graded each other's papers. Discusses how this established a genuine audience, empowered students, and generated enthusiasm. (SR)
Descriptors: Audience Awareness, Grading, Higher Education, Peer Evaluation


