Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 117 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 607 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1401 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2570 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
| Guskey, Thomas R. | 30 |
| Townsley, Matt | 17 |
| Jung, Lee Ann | 13 |
| Brookhart, Susan M. | 10 |
| Johnson, Martin | 9 |
| McMillan, James H. | 9 |
| Prather, James E. | 9 |
| Blackburn, Barbara R. | 7 |
| Bloxham, Sue | 7 |
| Cheng, Liying | 7 |
| Follman, John | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 468 |
| Teachers | 436 |
| Administrators | 99 |
| Researchers | 50 |
| Policymakers | 32 |
| Counselors | 25 |
| Students | 25 |
| Parents | 16 |
| Community | 12 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| United Kingdom | 129 |
| Australia | 107 |
| Canada | 95 |
| California | 70 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 69 |
| Sweden | 66 |
| Texas | 55 |
| United States | 51 |
| Florida | 39 |
| North Carolina | 36 |
| China | 35 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Eiser, Leslie – Classroom Computer Learning, 1987
A review of the many software programs for grading is presented. The programs are discussed in the categories of getting started, getting the information in, and getting the information out. (MNS)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Computer Software, Grading, Instruction
Peer reviewedCarpenter, Dale – Remedial and Special Education (RASE), 1985
A review of grading issues, philosophies, and recommendations is provided with implications and specific suggestions for grading mainstreamed handicapped pupils at the secondary level. A position statement related to grading secondary mainstreamed handicapped pupils concludes the paper. The need for a fair and clear grading system for all pupils…
Descriptors: Disabilities, Educational Philosophy, Grading, Mainstreaming
Peer reviewedSaville, Anthony – NASSP Bulletin, 1983
Seven alternative grading systems are presented emphasizing the weighting of honor points for ranking purposes. These systems are for schools using forms of student grouping or phasing systems. (MD)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation, Grades (Scholastic), Grading
Ronda, Donald E. – Industrial Education, 1984
Describes a method of grading that can be used in junior high industrial arts and high school vocational education. (JOW)
Descriptors: Grading, Industrial Arts, Secondary Education, Vocational Education
Wong, Martin R. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1973
Descriptors: Essay Tests, Grading, Higher Education, Scoring
Peer reviewedFollman, John; And Others – Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1972
Descriptors: College Students, Educational Research, Grading, Writing (Composition)
Gocker, Phillip L. – Balance Sheet, 1972
Descriptors: Academic Standards, Business Education, Grading, Student Evaluation
Weese, Sylvia – Bus Educ Forum, 1970
A simulation payroll incentive system, including earnings and deductions, is based on the mailability and correctability of letters. (CH)
Descriptors: Grading, Guidelines, Incentives, Shorthand
Herbold, Paul E. – Speech Teacher, 1971
The author states that grades as a measure of performance for speeches given in class cause anxiety and a gap between student and teacher. The author suggests that a written critique from the teacher and fellow students is a preferable means of evaluation. The student's final grade is based on a final speech and an examination. (MS)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Grading, Public Speaking, Speech Evaluation
Peer reviewedGoehring, Harvey J., Jr. – School Science and Mathematics, 1971
Describes procedure for a standard statistical analysis of student scores. Presupposes no familiarity of the reader with statistical concepts, and is intended as a functional, rather than theoretical, guide to student score analysis. (PR)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Grading, Scoring, Statistical Analysis
Peer reviewedHarris, L. Dale – Journal of Creative Behavior, 1971
Descriptors: Grading, Learning Processes, Problem Solving, Teaching Methods
Smith, Genevieve – Journal of Business Education, 1971
Descriptors: Business Education, Grading, Office Practice, Student Evaluation
Scott, Harry V. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1970
Descriptors: Grade Prediction, Grades (Scholastic), Grading, Higher Education
Chansky, Norman M. – Psychol Rep, 1969
Descriptors: Grading, Graduate Students, Perception, Research
Peer reviewedSimpson, Robert J.; Mills, Joe – Journal of Teacher Education, 1980
The trend toward using court litigation as a means to appeal unfair grading practices is discussed and recent cases are cited. (JD)
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Educational Legislation, Grading, Legal Problems


