NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing 586 to 600 of 1,216 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Andrulis, Richard S. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
Purpose of the investigation was to identify the underlying content and cognitive dimensions in a standardized achievement test in the area of life and health insurance. (Author)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Discriminant Analysis, Factor Analysis, Insurance Occupations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pyrczak, Fred – Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973
Despite the numerous individual illustrations in the literature showing how the discrimination index may be used to identify items with faults, its overall effectiveness as a measure of item quality, defined in terms of the presence or absence of faults, is not clear. This study investigates its validity. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Correlation, Discriminant Analysis, Item Banks, Rating Scales
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Borich, Gary D.; Bauman, Patricia M. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972
There is evidence that when spatial orientation and spatial visualization are measured with either the French or Guilford-Zimmerman tests that the variance due to authorship is greater than that due to trait. (Authors)
Descriptors: Aptitude Tests, Discriminant Analysis, Measurement Instruments, Measurement Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Burnham, Paul S.; Hewitt, Benjamin A. – Journal of Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Career Choice, College Graduates, Discriminant Analysis, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Williams, Warren S. – Journal of Psychology, 1972
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Comparative Testing, Discriminant Analysis, Experimental Psychology
Stahmann, Robert F. – Educ Psychol Meas, 1969
Descriptors: Career Choice, College Entrance Examinations, Discriminant Analysis, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Blanchfield, W. C. – Journal of Experimental Education, 1971
Research Project at Utica College to identify potential college dropouts using the technique of Multiple Discriminant Analysis. (RY)
Descriptors: Case Studies, College Students, Discriminant Analysis, Dropout Characteristics
Neill, John A.; Jackson, Douglas N. – Educ Psychol Meas, 1970
Descriptors: Correlation, Discriminant Analysis, Factor Analysis, Personality Assessment
Neal, Robert; King, Paul – J Counseling Psychol, 1969
Interprets College Interest Inventory, administered to 284 students, both ways, with neither method proving superior. Suggests that under restricted conditions, discriminant function might be more appropriate for counseling purposes than configural analysis. (Author/CJ)
Descriptors: Classification, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Data Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Alan D. – College Student Journal, 1982
Used a current attrition study to show the usefulness of discriminative analysis and a cross validation technique applied to student nonpersister questionnaire respondents and nonrespondents. Results of the techniques allowed delineation of several areas of sample under-representation and established the instability of the regression weights…
Descriptors: College Students, Discriminant Analysis, Higher Education, Regression (Statistics)
Robyak, James E.; Downey, Ronald G. – Journal of College Student Personnel, 1979
Differences between underachieving and nonunderachieving study skills students were found on measures of study skills knowledge and an extraversion-introversion personality dimension. Nonunderachievers reported greater study skills knowledge but not greater study skills use than underachievers. Findings were attributed to differences in…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, College Students, Discriminant Analysis, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cohen, Stephen L.; Penner, Louis A. – Personnel Psychology, 1976
In a recent article in this journal (EJ 130 391) Siegel and Bergman described a "miniature job training and evaluation" approach to performance prediction. This research highlights their methodology's strengths and weaknesses in light of standard procedures recommended in developing any set of predictors. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Critical Thinking, Discriminant Analysis, Job Skills, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Faber, Alice; Di Paolo, Marianna – Language Variation and Change, 1995
Argues that statistical analysis of the potential distinctiveness of near-merged contrastive pairs must simultaneously take into account several acoustical dimensions. Discriminant analysis of the speech of five Utah speakers distinguished near-merged contrasts but not homophones, suggesting that discriminant analysis is useful in assessing…
Descriptors: Acoustic Phonetics, Comparative Analysis, Discriminant Analysis, Language Variation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hsu, Louis M. – Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1989
Discusses three topics related to interpretation of discriminant analyses (DA's): (1) partial F ratios and partial Wilks's lambdas for predictor variables in standard, step-down, and stepwise DA's; (2) relation of goals of classification to definition/evaluation of classification rules; and (3) significance tests for total hit rates in internal…
Descriptors: Data Interpretation, Discriminant Analysis, Multivariate Analysis, Predictor Variables
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mueller, Ralph O.; Cozad, James B. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1988
Standardization procedures in discriminant analysis are discussed. Three leading software packages--SPSSX, BMDP, and SAS--are compared in terms of their calculations of unstandardized and standardized discriminant coefficients. Estimation procedures are described for each. Arguments are presented for within-group, rather than total, variance…
Descriptors: Computer Software, Computer Software Reviews, Discriminant Analysis, Estimation (Mathematics)
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  36  |  37  |  38  |  39  |  40  |  41  |  42  |  43  |  44  |  ...  |  82